Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Debo Samual


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Jmac said:

Been saying this for two seasons now. Some laughed and scoffed at the idea. It is way past time they make the change if they want to keep him and have him actually play and produce.

I would love a very incentive laden contract that pays for performance for CMC. Kind of like your average sales person who gets paid on commission. The better you do the more you get paid. 

Edited by Lets go get it Canes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was dumb to pay him CMC.  

But we did.  So when he is healthy, we should give him the reps his contract implies he should be getting.  When can limit his reps and he still can get hurt.  Then what.  He should get 20 touches a game. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

You want the ball in CMC's hands.  If giving it to him in open space saves his body more than giving it to him running through a six person gauntlet (Between the C gaps) I am all for it. CMC has EXCEPTIONAL hands and might be out of position at RB. 

Why do people assume he would be in open space if he lines up at slot wr? Him against LBs is an utter mismatch; him against a slot corner? Idk if it is.

I agree that getting the ball in his hands is a good thing. And I would like to see him have more targets than carries but I think that could still be done out of the backfield to maintain that mismatch. They want to bring a corner over to guard the rb? Pound it and let that corner get popped by one of our guards. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Trade for Jimmy G, draft Willis. Use CMC like Debo and let Chuba and Foreman play exclusively HB. Stop throwing the fuging ball to Chuba. 

Pickett. Not Willis. Willis has bust all of him. Plus running QBs don’t win Super Bowls. 

Edited by Lets go get it Canes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing this basically takes away his best weapon, which is his running ability. I know because he catches a lot of passes and makes LB's look stupid that people think he is a secret elite WR, well he isn't. He's an elite RB with elite RUNNING BACK catching ability.

I really am consistently amazed that people don't see that the thing that makes CMC an elite player is in fact his running ability.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Doing this basically takes away his best weapon, which is his running ability. I know because he catches a lot of passes and makes LB's look stupid that people think he is a secret elite WR, well he isn't. He's an elite RB with elite RUNNING BACK catching ability.

I really am consistently amazed that people don't see that the thing that makes CMC an elite player is in fact his running ability.

I don’t think it’s that. Everyone knows CMC is one of the best when healthy. But since he can’t stay healthy, moving him to a Debo like roll can keep him healthy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lets go get it Canes said:

I don’t think it’s that. Everyone knows CMC is one of the best when healthy. But since he can’t stay healthy, moving him to a Debo like roll can keep him healthy. 

Not too fine a point on it but you don't pay gadget players $10-15/mil a year. He's getting paid like a bell cow RB so he needs to play. If he can't stay healthy, then it is just time to move on.

That said, we also don't need to be using him at Ron Rivera rates. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...