Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per sources, the #Panthers have had conversations with Cam Newton regarding a return


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Going to wait until someone who is a little more plugged in reports on this… after the Watson debacle, Sheena needs to focus on facts instead of rumors for a bit.

From my understanding she’s pretty well connected with cam. If there’s anyone she has a scoop on, it’s cam. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

He was quite clear about not wanting to be a backup on a shitty team.

"I ain't comin' back for no 5-12."

I suppose you could try to sell him on this year's team being better with all the free agent signings, but he still might have more desirable options.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

"I ain't comin' back for no 5-12."

I suppose you could try to sell him on this year's team being better with all the free agent signings, but he still might have more desirable options.

I mean....I am not sold, so I don't know why he would be. But, it would be great for the team to have him back.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

"I ain't comin' back for no 5-12."

I suppose you could try to sell him on this year's team being better with all the free agent signings, but he still might have more desirable options.

Out of all the offered I’ve heard, Cle (prob not gna happen now), Indy (maybe), Seattle and Carolina; Carolina may be his best option.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

Out of all the offered I’ve heard, Cle (prob not gna happen now), Indy (maybe), Seattle and Carolina; Carolina may be his best option.

I wouldn't rank is above Seattle or Indy.

3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean....I am not sold, so I don't know why he would be. But, it would be great for the team to have him back.

Is it really gonna be a farewell tour though, or are we gonna see one or two good performances followed by three or four that leave everybody saying "yeah, he's done"?

I mean, they probably envisioned last year as a redemption story of some sort but it didn't really work out that way.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...