Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral Pro Day Today


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I like him better than Pickett. He's qb 2 on my board. Intriguing guy... not sure where people think his arm is better than Willis but we going to see today 

Come on Willis' placement wasn't very good yesterday vs air.

What do you think would happen in a game. 

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Come on Willis' placement wasn't very good yesterday vs air.

What do you think would happen in a game. 

He only missed like 2 passes. Acurracy isn't one of Willis issues. For a duel threat I would say his accuracy is good. He had the fastball and can take something off of it which even cam couldn't do. He's a better passer than you give him credit for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

A year ago, Howell was the #1 guy by several people, huddle included. Corral, Ridder, Willis, Pickett, all of them were not even considered a 2nd round pick. 

 

Now, none of these guys will make it out of the 1st or top 10. lol The hype machine makes money for these kids. 

I think realistically only 1 goes top 10. To much talent elsewhere ar other positions. We got atleast 3 tackles going top 10. Hamilton going top 5. Sauce is going top 10 probably the Walker kid..  I mean there are only so many spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

He only missed like 2 passes. Acurracy isn't one of Willis issues. For a duel threat I would say his accuracy is good. He had the fastball and can take something off of it which even cam couldn't do. He's a better passer than you give him credit for.

You are being dishonest. 

Balls were over the wrong shoulder. 

Balls were behind but catchable. Low but catchable. Lots of them. 

Against air an NFL QB should be perfect. Recievers should be able to put their hands in the same place everytime. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

He only missed like 2 passes. Acurracy isn't one of Willis issues. For a duel threat I would say his accuracy is good. He had the fastball and can take something off of it which even cam couldn't do. He's a better passer than you give him credit for.

I don't want a QB with any accuracy issues. 

I want Rodgers, Breese, Mahomes, Brady type accuracy. 

I don't want to hear dual threat level accuracy that's not good enough. Cam isn't a good measuring stick for accuracy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Catsfan69 said:

I don't want a QB with any accuracy issues. 

I want Rodgers, Breese, Mahomes, Brady type accuracy. 

I don't want to hear dual threat level accuracy that's not good enough. Cam isn't a good measuring stick for accuracy. 

I think you have to look at Willis as more of a Josh Allen.  Raw athletic QB that is coachable with a cannon for an arm.  Can he make the jump that Allen did in the NFL??  That's the million dollar question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are being dishonest. 

Balls were over the wrong shoulder. 

Balls were behind but catchable. Low but catchable. Lots of them. 

Against air an NFL QB should be perfect. Recievers should be able to put their hands in the same place everytime. 

I see nobody saying what your saying but you. Everyone I see say he had a great day made a lot of money and thats without running... now being mentioned going as high as 2. You sound like a hater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...