Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Corral Pro Day Today


ForJimmy
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Normally I’d agree, but he actually played worse when he had time to go through reads. His best games were early when he was checking down to CMC quickly and only needing one read. In the rare instances he had a pocket he would make the worst decisions. 

I'd  be shell shocked later too. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

I'd  be shell shocked later too. 

 

Either that or he can’t read a defense. Considering he had similar issues at USC and NYJ, I would lean towards not being able to read a defense. Either way it’s shown you can’t trust him when a play breaks down. It won’t always be a perfect pocket in today’s NFL and QBs need to be able to improvise when a play breaks down. Sam is going to poo the bed when this happens…

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hesitate to value the opinion of fans who watch games and never played it. As far as to say he can’t do this or that, who state the entire QB history, like they watched hours and hours of film on the guy, when in reality the heard a person say it once, tweet it once etc. and they pick it up as fact. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

I hesitate to value the opinion of fans who watch games and never played it. As far as to say he can’t do this or that, who state the entire QB history, like they watched hours and hours of film on the guy, when in reality the heard a person say it once, tweet it once etc. and they pick it up as fact. 

Looking Paramount Network GIF by Yellowstone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Actionman0z said:

I hesitate to value the opinion of fans who watch games and never played it. As far as to say he can’t do this or that, who state the entire QB history, like they watched hours and hours of film on the guy, when in reality the heard a person say it once, tweet it once etc. and they pick it up as fact. 

wrong forum bud

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, panthers55 said:

I think that Darnold will be the number 1 guy whether we pick a rookie or not. I have read somewhere that McAdoo likes Darnold better than Mayfield which is why we didn't jump on him right away.  It will be Darnolds job to lose. McAdoo wasn't here last year so he is going to install his offense and doesn't care about 2021. So if Darnold did suffer from a terrible line then he will improve with our hopefully better line and win us some games. If he still sucks there will be no one else to blame. How soon they expect to bench Darnold might influence who we pick if we go QB. If we need a starter right away then go with Pickett. Corral and Willis both would need to sit before they will be ready to start. So if you want either of them you need to hope Darnold can get much better with a line and good gameplan.

if McAdoo can turn Darnold into a legit NFL starter, everybody wins 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All three will be gone by 16-17, just like the OTs. This poo happens every year and people think we can drop down and still get who we want. Trading off six unless you want one of the 5 OTs is gonna backfire. Though i would prefer to trade back generally. 

Edited by Panthero
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Panthero said:

All three will be gone by 16-17, just like the OTs. This poo happens every year and people think we can drop down and still get who we want. Trading off six unless you want one of the 5 OTs is gonna backfire. Though i would prefer to trade back generally. 

It depends on where you trade down to.  We turned away an offer with -100 points on the deal which is steep.  I'd trade down for negative points, but 100 is too high. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I like Jaycee a lot and appreciate his leadership but to say he's above Ramsey right now is based on hopium let's be realistic. He's got a great deal to prove this season. I’m hoping to see that he firmly establishes himself amongst his peers.
    • It’s amazing how simple it is. When you are winning 2-7 games for 7 straight years, you’d think people would understand that just drafting some starters isn’t poo unless they are above average NFL starters. Justin Jefferson and Jamar Chase started their rookie years like Legette did so we got an elite WR in the 2024 draft. Luke was a rookie starter just like Wallace. Damn we basically got a Kuechly and Jefferson last year. Bravo Dan Morgan!!!
    • I didn’t even say they would be starters. I don’t think Legette will be and Coker was not drafted. Coker chose to sign with us because our WR room gave him a chance to start even though we drafted a guy in the 1st. That should tell you something when Coker chose to come to Carolina even after we took Legette. We drafted and signed guys to potentially replace Sanders, who isn’t a starter yet over Tremble) and Wallace. Go look at our other drafts since Rhule. We had tons of rookie contribution from all of our recent classes. Why, because our overall talent sucked and we needed bodies. Go look at PFR. Here’s some of our players who “started” for a year: TMJ, Mingo, BC, Ian Thomas, Jermaine Carter, Dennis Daley, YGM and Roy. That’s what Legette and Wallace are right now although unless TMac bombs, Legette has kind of already lost his spot. We’ve had shitty drafts since 2018 and every single one has contributed at least two guys who’ve started so 2024 is tied for last right now and we just had a draft where we took 3 more players who play the same position as 3 of our top 4 picks in 2024 but somehow I’m saying that the 2024 draft class is good? Nope, the 2024 draft class was bad and our team is still in the low enough talent quadrant that lots of rookie contribute in our holes until we replace them. Been the same story since 2018 and accelerated as the old solid vets retired/move on.
×
×
  • Create New...