Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule says giving CMC fewer reps at RB diminishes his value


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Carl Spackler said:

To be fair, he could've played at least 2-3 more games last year and the year before. Rhule held him out both times, so fans could blame the player and not the coach.

Who believes nonsense like this? It was not just one nagging injury they were holding him out for out of just precaution. It was multiple. You were so eager to attack anyone who said we were running him into the ground when his rate of usage was discussed now you are calling people Rhule boot lickers lmao. Get a grip.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

funny because part of the reason rhule was hired was because of his revolutionary "sports science department" and how it was supposes to cut down on injuries and improve performances

 

Followed up by installing turf so BOA could hold more event$

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

Keep licking Rhule's boots, then. Doctors said his ankle would be fine two weeks after he got hurt.

https://www.nfl.com/news/panthers-rb-christian-mccaffrey-out-for-season Nope, couldn't have played. It was considered a significant injury.

Maybe in 2020 but he had already been injured twice by that point.

Rhule is garbage and CMC is injury prone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jackson113 said:

You run running backs in the ground. That’s why you don’t pay them. That’s why you don’t draft them high….

This is why I want them to showcase CMC this year, then trade him next to get something in return. I love CMC but you don't make the RB the focal point of your offense. Not in today's NFL. You could have RB's from middle rounds be productive and still have a functioning offense. I hope Fitt see's this. Hurney had a hard on for RB's. This isn't 90's NFL anymore. Need to move on and get with the program. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

This is why I want them to showcase CMC this year, then trade him next to get something in return. I love CMC but you don't make the RB the focal point of your offense. Not in today's NFL. You could have RB's from middle rounds be productive and still have a functioning offense. I hope Fitt see's this. Hurney had a hard on for RB's. This isn't 90's NFL anymore. Need to move on and get with the program. 

His value isn’t going to get any higher then it is right now IMO.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

His value isn’t going to get any higher then it is right now IMO.  

Only way is down 30 is the wall and he's been hobbled by injuries two years in a row. Either you risk it and keep using him like you have or you pull back and his relevancy fades and with it his value. I don't think Rhule is using coach speak here he is going to continue to let CMC loose and if it doesn't work it may be a problem for a different coach altogether in another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, onmyown said:

Cmc IS a slot receiver

Eddleman was a QB btw

you truly believe that if belicheck Peyton or mcvay had cmc he’d be getting 30 Carrie’s at RB? Lol

it’s just lazy and inept 

I mean, we talking about the same Belichick who gave Cam the most rushes of his career (on a per-game basis) at age 31?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not in same league. Caldwell just hit a 10.00 on the RAS. 2nd out of 3830 from 1987 onward.  https://x.com/MathBomb/status/2027885023387349047 Yeah I mean Louis had a sub 9.00 RAS. Still very very good, no doubt. Louis is small, no 2 ways about it. He is likely a sub package lb in nickel packages or specialized WLB. Be fine ST gunner to start for sure. 6 foot flat and 220lb is pushing it for a starting LB. At 10 to 20lbs less than the other LBs he'd better be closer to the top in most timed drills. He's gonna be challenged when some of the wrs in the class can matchup bigger stronger faster, much less TE in the run game.  Yeah instinct matter and he has them, but that size is a massive red flag compared to many of the other LBS in this class.    Rodriguez is the LB that really climbed this week from a pure grit guy to great flash with athleticism people wrote off cause he was a QB at first at UVA. 18.4mph in the backpedal. Production the last 2 years were great. I'd be thrilled with him as the future mike.   Hill likely moved out of 51 and into the top 45 picks ( Ravens at 45 I can't imagine don't bite if he makes it there). Honestly Hill imo is a 1st rounder and I'd be ok with him as he fits the MLB we have missed the last few years. People would crow it's a reach but he's top 30 all-time I'm RAS for a LB at 9.9+ . Plus he was big time in big games when he was healthy. And that br a big check: meds. 
    • Miller, Melo, Coby, Moose, and Bridges all on the floor at the same time must be a nightmare for defenses lol. Switch one out for Kon and still a nightmare. Coby really does bring a true 6th man value and looks like he could start if Melo was out after only a few games of getting his feet wet. 
×
×
  • Create New...