Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, who do you like at QB?

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Forget trade backs and veteran trades--who would you like to see as the New QB in 2022?  

112 members have voted

  1. 1. Select one:

    • Baker Mayfield
      7
    • Jimmy Garappolo
      8
    • Malik Willis
      31
    • Sam Howell
      12
    • Kenny Pickett
      22
    • Matt Corral
      27
    • Desmond Ridder
      5

This poll is closed to new votes

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 04/01/2022 at 03:03 AM

Recommended Posts

rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I should have clarified--I was referring to who do you hope we pick up.  (Rhule, I think, said that we are adding a third QB to the room--just who do you hope that additional QB is?)

None of them. And by that I don't mean I like Darnold or Walker. I just don't want Rhule picking anyone. 

Forced to pick one of them, I'd go Corral followed closely by Willis. Pickett a good way past that, then after that.... nobody. 

I'd rather us focus on LT and don't big up much resources this year on QB. Rhule and Fitt we're dumb enough to pay for Darnold this year, they should be forced to roll with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
grimesgoat Experienced

grimesgoat

Posted
Posted

Continue the rebuild.

Trade back with Seattle.  Let them take Willis.  Draft Corral at 9.  Grab a DE, G, or T with the extra pick.

Start Darnold for 9 games.  If we are 4-5 or worse, make the change to Corral.  If we have a winning record after 9 games, wait until we are eliminated and make the switch.

After 2022, we will be off Darnold.  We'll have a decent idea who Corral is.  Our Offense and defense will be in good shape.  And we'll have a full complement of picks.

2022 is dark, but the future is bright (for those with patience).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DaveThePanther2008 Grand Master

DaveThePanther2008

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, grimesgoat said:

Continue the rebuild.

Trade back with Seattle.  Let them take Willis.  Draft Corral at 9.  Grab a DE, G, or T with the extra pick.

Start Darnold for 9 games.  If we are 4-5 or worse, make the change to Corral.  If we have a winning record after 9 games, wait until we are eliminated and make the switch.

After 2022, we will be off Darnold.  We'll have a decent idea who Corral is.  Our Offense and defense will be in good shape.  And we'll have a full complement of picks.

2022 is dark, but the future is bright (for those with patience).

If that's the case than we wasted a ton of money on decent free agents.  Why sign all these players if we are playing for 2023.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I should have clarified--I was referring to who do you hope we pick up.  (Rhule, I think, said that we are adding a third QB to the room--just who do you hope that additional QB is?)

In that case, Carson Strong with a Day 3 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, WestPanthers said:

 

Florio shitting on Rhule, Darnold and the Panthers.

Sims adding some logic to the discussion "Brady wasn't ready - I saw the same play 7 times by the 2nd Q, plus that OLine wasn't v good and they couldn't run the ball".

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Florio shitting on Rhule, Darnold and the Panthers.

Sims adding some logic to the discussion "Brady wasn't ready - I saw the same play 7 times by the 2nd Q, plus that OLine wasn't v good and they couldn't run the ball".

There is definitely something to be said about how outmatched Brady was at OC. If we land Icky or Neal Darnold will have no excuses this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

There is definitely something to be said about how outmatched Brady was at OC. If we land Icky or Neal Darnold will have no excuses this year. 

I think it's win-win.

If we draft a LT and Darnold continues to fail then both he and Rhule are out. If we draft a LT and Darnold succeeds then we win football games and (most) fans are happy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Thompcat Collaborator

Thompcat

Posted
Posted

The business side says go with Willis because of the upside and if he doesn't show progress with this staff start over next year. If the new staff likes Willis let them develop him. 

The personal side don't do a kid that way with this staff. Don't draft him and him get screwed up by this group. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...