Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person: "Others players aren’t as sold on Darnold as the answer."


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Yeah probably. I've done a lot of that myself, especially in my freelance ghostwriter days. But I'd always go back, reread, reproof, and edit. You write for a living. Do it right.

Yeah I agree. But in a Q&A, he probably lets the hair down a little (pun unintended).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as the actual content....I can see all that. Sammy has a couple buds on the team that will give him the benefit of if the doubt, especially in talking to others. But you know that team, even his buddies, wouldn't cry if we made a change. They know we need an upgrade. They all do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carl Spackler said:

Yeah I agree. But in a Q&A, he probably lets the hair down a little (pun unintended).

I can't even do that posting in here. I'll let some stuff get past me and I'll see it quoted and it drives me nuts and I'll go in and change it. I've even gone in people's posts that quoted me and changed it. #modpower 😆

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Pakmeng said:

The Athletic should hire editors. 

My good friend was a newspaper editor just 10 15 years ago buy days it basically ceases to exist now. It's not valued by the publications anymore 

I had a couple freelance editors I would send some work to when I got busy or for big money jobs and they were super valuable. Brutal at times because they would really chop it up but I always appreciated the work they did. It's a shame they aren't used/needed as much anymore.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

 

 

What's the reason for 5 minute edited policy?  Is this some petty Zod bullshit?

I think it's more of a platform thing, but also could be that some have abused it and gone back and changed some bold statements. I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL 

I hope Rhule is still sold. Go get that LT and try again lol. A healthy CMC...it's all too funny. Some people never learn but at least we can get that LT and still get rid of Rhule next year after Sam's first vet year where he is exactly the waste of talent at QB he has been since college. It would be hilarious if Rhule chose to do what I wanted forced upon him. 

parks and recreation please GIF

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, rayzor said:

"Others players"

C'mon Joe.

No.  Think about it.

Let's say Person does have connections to some of the Panthers players.  If he starts naming names in "print" of those who may not be sold on Darnold, how likely do you think those players will be to answer the phone again?

If a player publicly makes a statement, of course, Person can report that.  But when you're building relationships in an effort to get interesting tidbits, you can't out your sources.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, BrianS said:

No.  Think about it.

Let's say Person does have connections to some of the Panthers players.  If he starts naming names in "print" of those who may not be sold on Darnold, how likely do you think those players will be to answer the phone again?

If a player publicly makes a statement, of course, Person can report that.  But when you're building relationships in an effort to get interesting tidbits, you can't out your sources.

Sorry. Didn't have a problem with him saying other players and not specifying. He said "others players".  It's just me be being a grammatical jackass.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...