Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport says it could have been Pickett

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthro Community Regular

Panthro

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

Corral was at the top.

All good.  

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

I'll just say I've heard enough from Panthro to not doubt what he says. 

Now as far as Corrall vs. Willis vs. Pickett, it could be that the board was evolving and in flux throughout the process. 

Possible.

Said earlier that the team board and what Matt Rhule wanted may not have matched up.

(also factoring in Tepper's affinity for Pickett)

2 minutes ago, Panthro said:

If Ian was accurate then they would have taken their #2/#3 if it was pickett

See above.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Aussie Tank Grand Master

Aussie Tank

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Verge said:

It would have been Pickett or Penning for sure. Assuming the other tackles were gone too, which I guess was never going to happen as some expected. I highly doubt they would have taken Pickett over Neal or Cross, that is just not true lol

If the Tackles all went we would have had better trade down packages where taking those other players would make sense 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Centerfield Enthusiast

Centerfield

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

I trust Panthro.  He has shared many things over the years well before they happened.

That, and John Ellis also reported last night or this morning that Corral was the #1 QB on our board.

This is BS.

This is BS and Corral being the #1 QB on our board is too 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Panthro said Willis was the top quarterback on our board.

Pretty much every other source says it was Corral.

If they woulda been successful in trading up earlier before the Colts took Willis, I firmly believe he would've been the pick but the team didn't want to give up much to move. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • bigdog_10_2002
      Flux

      By bigdog_10_2002 · Posted

      I would write “give remmers tight end help” on a yellow sticky note and stuck it in shulas playbook the night before superbowl 50. 
    • strato
      Flux

      By strato · Posted

      And don’t worry about Bryce he will be great… Peyton Manning had a horrible rookie year too 😂
    • strato
      Top 10 worst qb rooms from CBS sports. Panthers number 9

      By strato · Posted

      Nothing wrong with it at all until you start telling others they are bad fans or not fans. But you are the good fan because you never say negative stuff about the team.    I did many years of that type of uninformed fanning because there really was no info and coverage like there is with the internet.    I mean, I used to go to the store and get Street and Smith’s annual football issue. That was about the extent of what you could get if you didn’t live in a big city with sportswriters covering and reporting.  There was no video to look at or replay the games and if you didn’t live in the market you could only rarely see your football team play.    TI have fanned since being a kid in the early 1960s, and as late as 1995 - ‘97 I lived in Atlanta and good luck getting more than 3 or 4 games a year on TV. No radio either. No print coverage outside of an AP recap and box unless they played Atlanta.  People today that have always had the network connection don’t know.    I wasn’t very educated about the Panthers until I finally got internet. 
×
×
  • Create New...