Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 2022 Quarterback Slide


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

the 2023 QB picture is going to look a lot different next April than it does today. 

Just look at who was projected to win the Heisman at the start of last season.   

No argument. I was more looking at who the teams are that might be targeting QBs early. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

It's called the silent tank.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Here's who PFF is thinking will draft one early next year.

 

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

that's weird mock.  I bet 3 cents a Clemson defensive lineman goes in the top 10 too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

Signs point to this being Carrols last season. They will let the new coach draft his QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Richardson and Levis have my eye as well.  Those two along with Van Dyke and McCall could definitely have the catapult.  We're talking size, speed, passers, a lot less red flags than this year's class.

Haener is a wildcard for me.  He's a bit shorter but he throws some absolute dimes and has led a lot of comeback wins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

In a nutshell it ain't pretty for successful qbs past 2nd

Situations matter too. High picks typically go to bad teams. Later picks typically go to better teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Except it takes those QB's a few years to develop because they needed to learn the mental side of the game and have it catch up to their physical attributes. Bryce was supposed to be a QB savant who already had a fully developed mental side of the game and that was going to make up for his lack of physical ability.  And his lack of NFL level QB physical traits has been clear as day to anyone who has watched him the last 3 years, mainly, he just doesn't have an NFL arm, he can't zip the ball into tight spaces or throw on a line down the field like is needed at this level.
    • Don’t recall seeing many of his interviews but what strikes me is that he engages and goes in depth. Even with the cliche answers as referenced by OP come across somewhat thoughtful.  Very likable personality despite being someone who can crush an average person like I can crush a paper cup. I knew Motons mother had a career at MSU but was looking on the google and found that Mushin Muhammad personally knew Motons grandfather.   His late grandfather was a professor at MSU.   Cool guy.  Interesting family and small world.      
    • I think people aren’t patient enough with Young. It can take a few years for a QB to develop. Look at Darnold, Baker and most recently Daniel Jones.   he hasn’t been able to put up big passing numbers either cause of how much we run the ball. You can tell our coaching staff still hasn’t took the training wheels off Bryce and let him go all out. We’ve had some pretty bad receivers as well. We finally got a true number one last year and look how much Bryce improved. Still we didn’t really have any depth behind TMac. Coker was hurt for a lot of the year and XL was our #2. How many big plays or TDs has XL dropped? I think this year can be the year we see Bryce able to hit his stride. If not then we can start looking for another qb but I just ask people to be patient.
×
×
  • Create New...