Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The 2022 Quarterback Slide


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CRA said:

the 2023 QB picture is going to look a lot different next April than it does today. 

Just look at who was projected to win the Heisman at the start of last season.   

No argument. I was more looking at who the teams are that might be targeting QBs early. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

It's called the silent tank.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Here's who PFF is thinking will draft one early next year.

 

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, davos said:

McKee is a bit unexpected.  He needs to make a major leap even with his upside.  6'6 230, sure, but 15 tds and leading Stanford to what like 3-10 does not compute for a top prospect.  

Will be SUPER interested to see who pops from the Levis/Haener/McCall/Richardson/Van Dyke crowd.

that's weird mock.  I bet 3 cents a Clemson defensive lineman goes in the top 10 too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Darknight said:

If you think about this logically, that's the only thing that make sense. They are basically saying this season is a wash without actually saying it. Drew Locke? Really?

I may be hard to believe but that is the only thing that make sense to me. They are getting their QB next year.

Signs point to this being Carrols last season. They will let the new coach draft his QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Van Duke and McCall to me are the most interesting past cj and Bryce.  Also the kid from Florida is getting major pub

Richardson and Levis have my eye as well.  Those two along with Van Dyke and McCall could definitely have the catapult.  We're talking size, speed, passers, a lot less red flags than this year's class.

Haener is a wildcard for me.  He's a bit shorter but he throws some absolute dimes and has led a lot of comeback wins.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

In a nutshell it ain't pretty for successful qbs past 2nd

Situations matter too. High picks typically go to bad teams. Later picks typically go to better teams. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ha-ha, I bet that went through everyone's mind.  Admittedly I don't read all the comments in a thread before I make a post. Great minds think alike!
    • Cam was hitting his stride as a QB in 2017/2018.     This is why I think stats like completion percentage are overrated. As long as a QB is clutch and makes the throws to win the game the rest doesn’t really matter. What good is a check down stat padder if they’re a choker.  Until Norv Turner (and briefly Chud) got here we put Cam in high pressure throwing situations all the time. We also ran the ball on first down more than most teams in the NFL in the Ron era. Coupled with shitty WRs, all that is expressed in his stats. I also assume Cam took the ball in his hands on many occasions rather than trust Funchess to catch the ball.    It was also never Cams job to play the game like someone else. His presence on the field dictated the game in a way that is rarely seen.  He showed he could play the dink and dunk game just before TJ Watt. That didn’t suddenly make him better than his earlier seasons. He just got put in a legit under center  passing game again for first time since his rookie year with Chud.    Ron took the quickest path to success and abused the RPO because his ass was about to get fired.    Cam never got the credit for being the cerebral player that he was. I just think when you are legitimately a human Superman, sometimes the best play is having the ball in your hands. He was a better passer than Delhomme was. 
    • I don't think Canales has any problem benching Bryce or moving on if Bryce doesn't come out playing like the end of last year.  It's year 3 no more excuses for Bryce
×
×
  • Create New...