Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top Gun: Maverick

Bama Panther

By Bama Panther,
in Nerdvana

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bama Panther Mentor

Bama Panther

Posted
Posted

I grew up an ‘80s kid. Top Gun is one of my all-time favorite movies. I looked forward to this sequel from the time it was announced. The COVID delays increased the hype for me. 

I have several great friends who are F-15 and F-16 pilots. On Opening Night, their squadron rented out an entire theater for a private showing. My boys and I got three of the extra tickets they had. It was a great experience to watch the movie with a bunch of people who actually do what Tom Cruise and his co-stars did in the movie.

Overall, I thought the movie was really good and fantastic entertainment. There is nostalgia from the first movie, but I don’t feel like they overdid it. The relationship between Iceman and Maverick was great to see. I plan to see it again while I’m without my family during an upcoming training. 

As a JAG, I also robbed my buddies a bit by telling them, “We all know the better Tom Cruise sequel is still in the works. Everyone is waiting with baited breathe for ‘A Few More Good Men.’”

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted
On 5/30/2022 at 9:30 AM, Bama Panther said:

I grew up an ‘80s kid. Top Gun is one of my all-time favorite movies. I looked forward to this sequel from the time it was announced. The COVID delays increased the hype for me. 

I have several great friends who are F-15 and F-16 pilots. On Opening Night, their squadron rented out an entire theater for a private showing. My boys and I got three of the extra tickets they had. It was a great experience to watch the movie with a bunch of people who actually do what Tom Cruise and his co-stars did in the movie.

Overall, I thought the movie was really good and fantastic entertainment. There is nostalgia from the first movie, but I don’t feel like they overdid it. The relationship between Iceman and Maverick was great to see. I plan to see it again while I’m without my family during an upcoming training. 

As a JAG, I also robbed my buddies a bit by telling them, “We all know the better Tom Cruise sequel is still in the works. Everyone is waiting with baited breathe for ‘A Few More Good Men.’”

Most of the reviews are positive. I will definitely see it when I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

I was still on active duty serving with Carrier Group Seven out of San Diego when the original was filmed. Let's just say Mr. Cruise, at the time, was pretty much a dick. He rode his motorcycle around the base at Miramar and was pulled a few times for speeding (most bases are posted 25 & 35 everywhere). 

Some of the carrier scenes the ship had to maneuver to catch the sun just right for the shot or get the wind in a certain direction...

I was still competing in triathlons at the time and I would ride by the house they used for Kelly McGillis's character. It was moved down the block from where it was built to make room for a beachfront promenade, but here's a pre-move story:

I was in San Diego just 2 weeks ago to see my father and I took my wife to see the other famous location- where the Top Gun CO lived, which is the Coast Guard San Diego Lighthouse property:

This is where it is on Point Loma:

image.png.474e9f69f83256cb7bf9ae1b023852ef.png

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
d-dave Grand Master

d-dave

Posted
Posted
On 6/2/2022 at 11:23 AM, Panther'sBigD said:

I'm sure it's a good movie. Tom Cruise is clinically insane, but he's never made a movie I wouldn't watch. That said, beyond being cool to watch, what purpose do manned fighter jets serve in this day and age? Haven't drones rendered them more or less obsolete? 

I think it's the human element.  When we think about giving machines more and more responsibility in our day to day lives (consider how much they already run things), we need to be careful.  I ended up learning a fair amount about these kinds of jets as I've learned what I can about that thing in Europe.

An Air Force works like a big organism with a lot of moving parts that do very specific jobs.  Like you wouldn't ask a bomber to win a dog fight.  Or a fighter to attack ground based radar targets.  Each of these multi-million dollar machines has a very specific job description.  From an attack stand point, a fighter jet is going to attack anything in the air.  From bombers, to radar craft, to other fighters, escorts, whatever.  That's their job.

Why not just use drones?  I think it comes down to a few things: situational awareness, latency, and overall investment.  As awesome and advanced as our computer systems are, our brains are just better at filtering data and making better decisions.  I mean, look at Tesla's Auto Drive system..  Even with a person behind a joystick, looking at data and projections and cameras, it won't be  the same as the butt in the seat.  

Also, think about latency.  That's the time it takes for a command to go from an input to an action.  Like in playing an online video game - your latency affects everyone else's game experience.  So modern gaming displays can translate input in 10-30 milliseconds.  And you're usually within a few feet of your display.  Change that to hundreds if not thousands of miles...  I just don't think that works.

Why is the US Air Force the best in the world?  'Cuz 'Murica?  Or because we spend so much money on not only the best tech, but the best possible training.  Putting the best tools in the hands of our best pilots is going to give you the best outcomes, even accounting for human error.  That's what tends to happen in any career or task - give the best trained/most skilled person the best tools for the job, and they will do an incredible job.

Sorry for the long treatise.  I'm not a pilot or military guy.  I'm just a dude who thinks too much, and tries to learn as much as I can.  Folks in the know are more than welcome to correct my idiotic mistakes and mischaracterizations!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Hugor Hill Collaborator

Hugor Hill

Posted
Posted

It really helps that Cruise and co. were actually flying in real planes and not relying on cgi to do the bulk of the work. I didnt even care to watch it but my wife convinced me to see it with her and I went in to watching it with the perception that it wasnt going to be any good, but man, let me tell you, after the movie was over I really thought it was one of the better movies that have come out in recent years.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thefuzz Mentor

thefuzz

Posted
Posted
On 6/27/2022 at 8:37 AM, Hugor Hill said:

It really helps that Cruise and co. were actually flying in real planes and not relying on cgi to do the bulk of the work. I didnt even care to watch it but my wife convinced me to see it with her and I went in to watching it with the perception that it wasnt going to be any good, but man, let me tell you, after the movie was over I really thought it was one of the better movies that have come out in recent years.

Agreed...just a really fun movie to watch.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Let's be completely honest about this... Our WR room is AT and a bunch of question marks. Thielen is the only guy we know who knows the route tree completely, understands play calls and can regularly get open/beat close coverage when necessary. He's long in the tooth, isn't the speediest guy on the field but he plays like a pro, starting level wide receiver. Xavier, last season looked great at first, but man he kind of petered out down the stretch and would disappear in a number of games. He wasn't reliable on routes or getting open and where he was supposed to be a king at contested catches, he often looked a bit intimidated. I'm not saying he's a washout by any means. Anyone with his size, speed and catch radius could make it big in the NFL, but can he do it? He'll need to show more than he did in the preseason before we can really rely on him as a WR1 or WR2.  Coker was a revelation last season, he really played way above his (non)draft status and flashed multiple times in games and was a steady performer. What we need to find out, though, is whether he was benefiting from being an unknown that wasn't getting maximum effort from opposing DBs or if he was just outworking and outhustling everyone on the field. We should find out this season. We sure as hell didn't find out much in the pre-season (from him or any receiver or QB for that matter). He's still a question mark, but I think he has the look of the real deal. He might be this generation's next Thielen. Now, let's talk about Tet. High first round draft pick, first true WR off the board this year. Stellar career out west in college. Has the swagger of the WR1. And man, y'all are going to get mad about this but... he comes across as a mook. And in the pre-season he performed, well, not so great against poor opposition of second and third stringers. Yeah, he caught that one moonshot ball in the first game but really, nothing else lighting the place up. Rookie endzone drop in that game, too. He's still young and adjusting, I'm sure, but I was hoping to see something of a breakthrough kind of guy. I'm still looking. Hunter Renfro? Gosh, I hope he can make the team and make a comeback to his old form. It would be such a great story. But maybe neither one of those happens. We won't know until Tuesday and then, if he makes it past there it could be weeks. So, TL;DR: AT is all we can bank on right now. We couldn't afford to let him go considering the number of unknowns we'd be throwing out there for our QB, who himself is still an unknown. One thing to add: Our receivers coaching group has their work cut out for them. I hope they are up to the task, but the pre-season gave me little reason to believe in them. And I really need something to believe in here in Carolina.  
    • PantherChris
      PFF grades from last night...Ransom had a night

      By PantherChris · Posted

      Same I think Randsom is a baller..... hopefully we don't have to suffer through 4-8 games of Scott blowing azz to get him on the feild.
    • Bear Hands
      2025 Roster Cuts

      By Bear Hands · Posted

      Linebacker is the biggest need - I hope we figure out a way to address it. Krys Barnes is the only one who even moderately flashed.  Super nervous about Trevin/Rozeboom as a duo (Still like Trevin) I'd be excited if we had a better vet to mentor Trevin.  Or a better younger guy to support Rozeboom.  They just don't fit well and it may be a big problem against the run, even with our DL much improved. 
×
×
  • Create New...