Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Top Gun: Maverick


Bama Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

I grew up an ‘80s kid. Top Gun is one of my all-time favorite movies. I looked forward to this sequel from the time it was announced. The COVID delays increased the hype for me. 

I have several great friends who are F-15 and F-16 pilots. On Opening Night, their squadron rented out an entire theater for a private showing. My boys and I got three of the extra tickets they had. It was a great experience to watch the movie with a bunch of people who actually do what Tom Cruise and his co-stars did in the movie.

Overall, I thought the movie was really good and fantastic entertainment. There is nostalgia from the first movie, but I don’t feel like they overdid it. The relationship between Iceman and Maverick was great to see. I plan to see it again while I’m without my family during an upcoming training. 

As a JAG, I also robbed my buddies a bit by telling them, “We all know the better Tom Cruise sequel is still in the works. Everyone is waiting with baited breathe for ‘A Few More Good Men.’”

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2022 at 9:30 AM, Bama Panther said:

I grew up an ‘80s kid. Top Gun is one of my all-time favorite movies. I looked forward to this sequel from the time it was announced. The COVID delays increased the hype for me. 

I have several great friends who are F-15 and F-16 pilots. On Opening Night, their squadron rented out an entire theater for a private showing. My boys and I got three of the extra tickets they had. It was a great experience to watch the movie with a bunch of people who actually do what Tom Cruise and his co-stars did in the movie.

Overall, I thought the movie was really good and fantastic entertainment. There is nostalgia from the first movie, but I don’t feel like they overdid it. The relationship between Iceman and Maverick was great to see. I plan to see it again while I’m without my family during an upcoming training. 

As a JAG, I also robbed my buddies a bit by telling them, “We all know the better Tom Cruise sequel is still in the works. Everyone is waiting with baited breathe for ‘A Few More Good Men.’”

Most of the reviews are positive. I will definitely see it when I can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was still on active duty serving with Carrier Group Seven out of San Diego when the original was filmed. Let's just say Mr. Cruise, at the time, was pretty much a dick. He rode his motorcycle around the base at Miramar and was pulled a few times for speeding (most bases are posted 25 & 35 everywhere). 

Some of the carrier scenes the ship had to maneuver to catch the sun just right for the shot or get the wind in a certain direction...

I was still competing in triathlons at the time and I would ride by the house they used for Kelly McGillis's character. It was moved down the block from where it was built to make room for a beachfront promenade, but here's a pre-move story:

I was in San Diego just 2 weeks ago to see my father and I took my wife to see the other famous location- where the Top Gun CO lived, which is the Coast Guard San Diego Lighthouse property:

This is where it is on Point Loma:

image.png.474e9f69f83256cb7bf9ae1b023852ef.png

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2022 at 11:23 AM, Panther'sBigD said:

I'm sure it's a good movie. Tom Cruise is clinically insane, but he's never made a movie I wouldn't watch. That said, beyond being cool to watch, what purpose do manned fighter jets serve in this day and age? Haven't drones rendered them more or less obsolete? 

I think it's the human element.  When we think about giving machines more and more responsibility in our day to day lives (consider how much they already run things), we need to be careful.  I ended up learning a fair amount about these kinds of jets as I've learned what I can about that thing in Europe.

An Air Force works like a big organism with a lot of moving parts that do very specific jobs.  Like you wouldn't ask a bomber to win a dog fight.  Or a fighter to attack ground based radar targets.  Each of these multi-million dollar machines has a very specific job description.  From an attack stand point, a fighter jet is going to attack anything in the air.  From bombers, to radar craft, to other fighters, escorts, whatever.  That's their job.

Why not just use drones?  I think it comes down to a few things: situational awareness, latency, and overall investment.  As awesome and advanced as our computer systems are, our brains are just better at filtering data and making better decisions.  I mean, look at Tesla's Auto Drive system..  Even with a person behind a joystick, looking at data and projections and cameras, it won't be  the same as the butt in the seat.  

Also, think about latency.  That's the time it takes for a command to go from an input to an action.  Like in playing an online video game - your latency affects everyone else's game experience.  So modern gaming displays can translate input in 10-30 milliseconds.  And you're usually within a few feet of your display.  Change that to hundreds if not thousands of miles...  I just don't think that works.

Why is the US Air Force the best in the world?  'Cuz 'Murica?  Or because we spend so much money on not only the best tech, but the best possible training.  Putting the best tools in the hands of our best pilots is going to give you the best outcomes, even accounting for human error.  That's what tends to happen in any career or task - give the best trained/most skilled person the best tools for the job, and they will do an incredible job.

Sorry for the long treatise.  I'm not a pilot or military guy.  I'm just a dude who thinks too much, and tries to learn as much as I can.  Folks in the know are more than welcome to correct my idiotic mistakes and mischaracterizations!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

It really helps that Cruise and co. were actually flying in real planes and not relying on cgi to do the bulk of the work. I didnt even care to watch it but my wife convinced me to see it with her and I went in to watching it with the perception that it wasnt going to be any good, but man, let me tell you, after the movie was over I really thought it was one of the better movies that have come out in recent years.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/27/2022 at 8:37 AM, Hugor Hill said:

It really helps that Cruise and co. were actually flying in real planes and not relying on cgi to do the bulk of the work. I didnt even care to watch it but my wife convinced me to see it with her and I went in to watching it with the perception that it wasnt going to be any good, but man, let me tell you, after the movie was over I really thought it was one of the better movies that have come out in recent years.

Agreed...just a really fun movie to watch.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...