Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Former NFL Executive Breaks Down How Teams Are Beating The Salary Cap


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Louie said:

Great breakdown of how teams can basically circumvent the salary cap for several years.

The Saints have done it a decade or more. This is exactly why I keep saying the cap can be manipulated so you can sign who you want. Stop posting we have cap issues and that we have to choose between this guy and that. We can sign anyone we want. Now an ex-GM confirms it.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, panthers55 said:

The Saints have done it a decade or more. This is exactly why I keep saying the cap can be manipulated so you can sign who you want. Stop posting we have cap issues and that we have to choose between this guy and that. We can sign anyone we want. Now an ex-GM confirms it.

Yeah but you have to be smart enough to manipulate it. For a long time, we were not smart enough to do so.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other caveat is that you need to have long term vision and planning.  Head coaches don't tend to be on board with that because they are evaluated on wins and losses.  GM's are evaluated on talent evaluation and acquisition.

A GM might evaluate his roster and think "We're not going to be very good this year, so let's take our medicine".  It could come in the form of cutting ties with a player to take a big hit.  It could come in the form of extending a player with a LOT of money right up front. 

A coach wants a roster that can win now.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

The other caveat is that you need to have long term vision and planning.  Head coaches don't tend to be on board with that because they are evaluated on wins and losses.  GM's are evaluated on talent evaluation and acquisition.

A GM might evaluate his roster and think "We're not going to be very good this year, so let's take our medicine".  It could come in the form of cutting ties with a player to take a big hit.  It could come in the form of extending a player with a LOT of money right up front. 

A coach wants a roster that can win now.

And this is more relevant to our current situation where we have a head coach that is a GM. We have fuged up two straight seasons/offseasons with big pushes to "win now" when we didn't have the roster to do so.

It's the classic example of why you want a GM that operates independently from the head coach. Doesn't mean they can commiserate on the future but the GM is really supposed to be managing that long term direction. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah but you have to be smart enough to manipulate it. For a long time, we were not smart enough to do so.

Actually I don't think Richardson had or wanted to spend the money. Tepper seems willing to spend it and has billions more than Richardson.  Of course we have struggled mightily with picking the right guys and paying them appropriately.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Actually I don't think Richardson had or wanted to spend the money. Tepper seems willing to spend it and has billions more than Richardson.  Of course we have struggled mightily with picking the right guys and paying them appropriately.

We didn't have a problem spending money, look at the cap hell Hurney created. We just had a problem being smart with it.

I have yet to determine if Tepper is willing to spend it. The smoke around all the QB's we have pursued certainly seems to indicate that he is.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You fix this by making contract split evenly over the span ex.(5yr/$100 million contract is automatically $20 million a year). Let’s say only $45 million is guaranteed, that number has to start at the front and end in the 3rd year with a $5 million guarantee, no more spreading numbers out in ghost years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

You fix this by making contract split evenly over the span ex.(5yr/$100 million contract is automatically $20 million a year). Let’s say only $45 million is guaranteed, that number has to start at the front and end in the 3rd year with a $5 million guarantee, no more spreading numbers out in ghost years. 

I went to bed a little too late last night and I will admit that  my reasoning is a bit amiss this morning. Can you breakdown your scenario a little bit more. I don't understand the part about the 3rd year having a $5mil guarantee. Wouldn't that be each of the first 3 years be $15 mil?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Riverboat Ron said:

You fix this by making contract split evenly over the span ex.(5yr/$100 million contract is automatically $20 million a year). Let’s say only $45 million is guaranteed, that number has to start at the front and end in the 3rd year with a $5 million guarantee, no more spreading numbers out in ghost years. 

Neither the players nor owners would want this situation. That's the problem with this solution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...