Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carlos Dunlap Visiting Panthers


XClown1986
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It's not about putting the defense on his back. We literally lack pass rushers. TBH, Dunlap would probably be our best all-around DE if he signed with us. 

I don't want to see a long term or high priced deal but he would immediately make our defense better.

Will Dunlap take this team from a non-playoff team to a playoff team?  Again, Rhule sending mixed messages.  He goes from a seemingly young roster-building approach to these type moves, which is more win now signaling.   Apparently he can't make up his mind.  It's like 'I want to build this roster through young guys'.  *SQUIRREL* Older FA veteran available....must sign now!!!!

Edited by 45catfan
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Will Dunlap take this team from a non-playoff team to a playoff team?  Again, Rhule sending mixed messages.  He goes from a seemingly young roster-building approach to these type moves, which is more win now signaling.   Apparently he can't make up his mind.  It's like 'I want to build this roster through young guys'.  *SQUIRREL* Older FA veteran available....must sign now!!!!

No one in free agency right now will magically make us playoff team. Still this would be a solid signing because we are lacking depth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Will Dunlap take this team from a non-playoff team to a playoff team?  Again, Rhule sending mixed messages.  He goes from a seemingly young roster-building approach to these type moves, which is more win now signaling.   Apparently he can't make up his mind.  It's like 'I want to build this roster through young guys'.  *SQUIRREL* Older FA veteran available....must sign now!!!!

I don't have a problem with a good vet signing. The Panthers have plenty of young guys but lack leadership (hint, Shaq ain't it). If it's a short-term deal at a reasonable cost, I'm all for it.

Ask yourself this, whose development would he be blocking? YGM maybe? He's the only one I can think of and if Dunlap plays fewer than 40% of the snaps, that's not an issue.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Raleigh PF said:

I don't have a problem with a good vet signing. The Panthers have plenty of young guys but lack leadership (hint, Shaq ain't it). If it's a short-term deal at a reasonable cost, I'm all for it.

Ask yourself this, whose development would he be blocking? YGM maybe? He's the only one I can think of and if Dunlap plays fewer than 40% of the snaps, that's not an issue.

Unless he's coming here on a 'home town deal', then it's not a good signing.  I don't have a problem with a good veteran signing if a) it's going to make a good team even better and b) doesn't hurt the cap much down the road.  We know the first scenario is isn't a factor and we will see about the second scenario. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With each additional quality veteran signing our cap number is getting worse.  For what?  Again, the only signing that will make the needle move much at all THIS season is QB.  Jimmy G. or Mayfield.  For Rhule, digging the hole even deeper for one of those two guys to get a wildcard spot would definitely be worth it.  Rotational veteran pieces for 'a veteran presence' is just eating up more cap down the road.

Teams in the red for 2023:

image.png.93de926dbc883efbecf84d2a31b93a48.png

Edited by 45catfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just play YGM and see if he is the answer or of we need to draft one. Either the guys we have are depth and nothing more or not. This is a starter right? So he isn't the depth. The constant BS and directionlessness of this team is infuriating. Coach up some young talent and play them. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Waldo said:

Just play YGM and see if he is the answer or of we need to draft one. Either the guys we have are depth and nothing more or not. This is a starter right? So he isn't the depth. The constant BS and directionlessness of this team is infuriating. Coach up some young talent and play them. 

Agreed, if YGM isn't the answer DE is a day 1 or day 2 priority next draft.  We won't know if he plays behind a veteran whose obviously better than him now and said veteran likely will be using us for a Reddick scenario and bounce after a solid year.  What does that accomplish?  Dude helped pad our sack numbers for a season and we still don't have a firm idea about YGM?  Wow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Agreed, if YGM isn't the answer DE is a day 1 or day 2 priority next draft.  We won't know if he plays behind a veteran whose obviously better than him now and said veteran likely will be using us for a Reddick scenario and bounce after a solid year.  What does that accomplish?  Dude helped pad our sack numbers for a season and we still don't have a firm idea about YGM?  Wow!

Reddick is a LB .... YGM is a DE...  they played two different roles on this defense.

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Reddick is a LB .... YGM is a DE...  they played two different roles on this defense.

Yes, but he used his 1-year deal based of his sack numbers to get paid handsomely elsewhere.  He was a rush/edge LB.  Semantics dude and yes, I'm well aware of the difference between a LB and DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yes, but he used his 1-year deal based of his sack numbers to get paid handsomely elsewhere.  He was a rush/edge LB.  Semantics dude and yes, I'm well aware of the difference between a LB and DE.

what does that have to do with YGM's growth though? He didnt take snaps from YGM...

 

It would make sense if you meant Morgan Fox instead of Reddick. Since YGM was behind Fox on the depth chart for RDE...  but even that isnt really worth the scrutiny you are attempting to give this situation. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheRealPantherFan said:

Had more sacks than Burns last season. 

Dunlap had 8.5 -- https://www.nfl.com/players/carlos-dunlap/stats/career

Burns had 9 -- https://www.nfl.com/players/brian-burns/stats/career

__________________________________________________________________________________

I'm not sure how you got ''more'' base don facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...