Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Build your offensive skill positions with $15


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

For a less obvious build:

$3 Beuerlein, $4 Stew (assuming this is Double Trouble Stew and not 2018 Stew), $5 Smitty, $1 Samuel, $2 King

Beuerlein can make all the throws and drive the ball when needed, Stew and King give a power running element but Stew is still elusive/explosive and a major tackle-breaker and King never drops passes while making some clutch catches, and Smitty and Samuel take the top off and are good for some highlight-reel grabs.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, thunderraiden said:

$4 Jake, $5 89, $1 Stephen Davis, $1 Curtis Samuel, $4 Wesley Walls.

I picked the same.  Prime Jake the gunslinger. Davis the workhorse. Smith, nothing else needs to be said. Samual can also be used as the speed rb. Walls was a red zone machine. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam($5)

Deangelo(3$)

Curtis($1)

Robby($1)

Greg Olsen(5$)

Reasoning, Cam is by far our greatest QB and 2015 Cam was nearly unstoppable. Also, that year he made the most out of a bad group of WR’s so Curtis and Robby even at $1 would be a big upgrade. Pairing Cam back up with prime Olsen who was his primary target anyway would give us the best offense in the league. Especially with prime D WILL fuging the league up with Cams RPO upside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thunderraiden said:

$4 Jake, $5 89, $1 Stephen Davis, $1 Curtis Samuel, $4 Wesley Walls.

Pretty good. 

I didn't follow instructions 😂

I guess I'd have to amend mine to

$3 Beuerlein, $3 D-Will, $5 Smitty, $3 Mangum and $1 Samuel.

 

I think Smitty will be a near-unanimous pick (but there are always the haters).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, shaq said:

Cam($5)

Deangelo(3$)

Curtis($1)

Robby($1)

Greg Olsen(5$)

Reasoning, Cam is by far our greatest QB and 2015 Cam was nearly unstoppable. Also, that year he made the most out of a bad group of WR’s so Curtis and Robby even at $1 would be a big upgrade. Pairing Cam back up with prime Olsen who was his primary target anyway would give us the best offense in the league. Especially with prime D WILL fuging the league up with Cams RPO upside.

Hey, if it's at their best, then 2015 Cam is one of the best there ever was. But, we just couldn't catch a 2015 Cam in a bottle.

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, top dawg said:

Just a useless summer exercise. I'm too  lazy to try and post a bunch of junk that may not play nice with the app, so hit the link if interested. 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/lists/build-panthers-offense-newton-mccaffrey-smith-olsen/

I got Beuerlein, D-Will, Smitty, and Walls.

I don't think y'all are touching me.

 

 

 

D-Will should be dead to all Panthers fans.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...