Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther


uncfan888
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Plus if we extend Baker off one year of play we just went through this whole "rebuild" without ever getting to Fitts philosophy of drafting a cheap QB to build around for a 4-5 year window. If we have no intentions of extending him it's also a waste of time, unless it shows Tepper that Rhule is the problem, not the 6 qb's he's trotted out on the field. 

 

Like I said, this is worst case scenario, we are going to extend this jackass based on average play

 

Seems like just yesterday Fitt was bragging about scouting wilson, drafting him and then turning him loose into a franchise qb.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

YOUR biggest complaint is that we got better.  You are concerned we might extend Baker for having a good year.  My God you are just complaining and contradicting yourself while doing so.  Did we not get better?  Then Baker will be a FA next year and only cost us a late round pick. 

Did we? How much better? A game? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Again, I worry about our lack of foresight. We only went Iky and FA OL wild because we took two years to come up with the worst OL there was. Your other post about the 2018 draft is cringeworthy.

I understand Mayfield is an improvement but we are on QB4 in 3 years who have been told by other organizations that they aren’t starter worthy. If we aren’t prioritizing our future QB situation, that’s another gigantic red flag because no one aside from us is thinking that 5-12 Carolina plus Mayfield is a legit playoff team.

I think the main priority right now is to save Matt Rhule's ass.

(at least according to Matt Rhule)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Cam Lawter said:

It's pretty easy.

Baker Mayfield makes watching Panther Football bearable again. If Darnold was the starter this year, the panthers stadium would be a ghost town and if anyone did show up, would be just to boo him.  Best case scenario, Mayfield plays lights out and we found a great quarterback. Worst Case: He is here for 1 year that cost 5 million dollars. 

So many crybabies complaining that they actually get to watch a competent football team this season for peanuts is laughable. Mayfield, McCafferey, new improvised O-line, along with our WR's, I am hype for this season!! 

6-12-6-6  Yearly wins for baker.  Thats bearable to you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I think the main priority right now is to save Matt Rhule's ass.

(at least according to Matt Rhule)

Which is my argument all along, it shouldnt have gotten to this point where we are fuging trading for Baker even after the Darnold and teddy disasters.  It was a fuged plan from the jump and keeps getting fuged as we go forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

fair enough

 

6-12-6-6

I assume that's his wins per season. To be fair... the question only asked about 2020, and I doubt he accomplishes that former glory. I simply say that if he plays like a starter, he should get paid as a starter. It's up to him whether he does that this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We got marginally better compared to sam fuging darnold however its in the short term.  This doesnt do jack poo in regards to our long term goal and team building.   So what the fuging point is having Baker on a one year deal if we are going to let him walk?  This doesnt make sense but then again I am arguing with a dude that defend signing teddy and trading for Darnold. 

 

Baker is not a franchise qb and there are now 4 years worth of data to prove it.

I defended Teddy and Darnold?  I thought Teddy was a stop gap QB and wanted us to draft Fields even with Darnold.  Mr Scot and I argued about Fields vs Slater (he wanted Slater).  I didn't trust Darnold and wanted us to still draft Fields even after the trade.  You just want to complain over a low risk trade.  You were just posting about how difficult it will be is Baker beats out his 2020 season?  If he does that we are not "marginally" better.  I'm not as high on Baker as I am how little we have up to acquire him. If the worst thing we did this offseason is acquire a mid-level starting QB for $5 million dollars and a conditional 5th, then we had a decent offseason.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

A rookie QB looking competent is one way to do that without making the playoffs. If Corral looks decent even in losses and the OL looks like it’s coming together, that would check our biggest boxes this year even if we didn’t go to the playoffs. Mayfield, as I mentioned above, means playoffs or fired.

Didn't say it was a good plan...

Either way, I don't think Rhule has a lot of faith in rookie QBs. His comments about Fields last year were a clue to that.

Par for the course, it's a checkers move in a chess game.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

A rookie QB looking competent is one way to do that without making the playoffs. If Corral looks decent even in losses and the OL looks like it’s coming together, that would check our biggest boxes this year even if we didn’t go to the playoffs. Mayfield, as I mentioned above, means playoffs or fired.

bingo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...