Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield is a Carolina Panther

uncfan888

By uncfan888,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, frankw said:

By this time next year he'll be gone and you are welcome to follow him.

You might be the stupidest person here football wise.

 

I'm 90% sure Baker can't win the Superbowl. 

I'm 90% sure Sam could if we can get his mental game up to top 5 level.

Sam is either sink or swim and nothing in between and both are great results for us long term.

Baker is tread water. I'm sick of middle of the road.

Superbowls or something that leads to a Superbowl in the next 20 years.

 

Is Baker better than Sam? Right now probably. But he doesn't have more physical talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, onmyown said:

I do agree the price was right. But it’s not one mistake. I feel giving a coach making the wrong moves more ammo at the detriment of the team to be the dumbass move here personally, when the obvious one is to move on from said coach. And the team an fans suffer all the same. It’s not demanding they start, it’s demanding results with the resources given and recognizing it wouldn’t be a bright idea to allow someone to use more to make more mistakes.

Yes the price was low but was Watson’s? I mean let’s be real, Teddy, Sam, Watson…we’re really idiotic moves. We really are just throwing poo against the wall for year 5 now. Is tanking one year REALLY considered making everyone suffer competitively speaking? I say no.

But as I said price was right. I don’t hate the move I just hate we are always looking to make these moves year after year after year.

I have a feeling Watson was more Tepper than Rhule, but yeah it has been ugly.  Hopefully they have done some internal power restructuring, but who knows??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

You might be the stupidest person here football wise.

You've repeatedly argued that Sam Darnold is actually a good QB with data showing he is the worst starter over the last several years. Look in the mirror before throwing around statements like this guy.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

Matt Corral coming in and doing better than Zach Wilson or as good as Mac Jones saves our franchise and instantly makes our team a winner.

Matt Corral is a man. A man who is a very good QB. Why shouldn't the MAN play football? He played last year. He played QB in offenses before Kiffin. Now with McAdoo. What's the difference?

Matt Corral is better than Sam and Baker off top. Much higher ceiling. The focus should be acclimating him to the offense and preparing Baker and Sam for backup duty, THATS who THEY are.

The future is NOW.

 

Screenshot_20220618-002624~2.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted (edited)

This franchise is p*ssy.

It's time to fall in and get behind your boy. This QB draft was sabotaged. 

The two best QBs, Matt Corral and Carson Strong, the two most accurate passers in the draft were artificially thrust to the side. Good for us because if you believe in that Kinny Pickett hype you're...

Seth Meyers Lol GIF by Late Night with Seth Meyers

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, frankw said:

You've repeatedly argued that Sam Darnold is actually a good QB with data showing he is the worst starter over the last several years. Look in the mirror before throwing around statements like this guy.

I've never argued he was good.

I argued his was the best option for our long term success.

I'll take 10 3 win seasons in a row with a Superbowl over 11 playoff appearances and no Superbowls.

Sam either gets it = win

Doesn't get it and we get a great draft pick and we get to see Matt = Win.

 

Baker is going to be a 9-8 to 11-5 guy and if he does that I see these idiots signing him long term thus putting us in the position of regularly making the playoffs but never getting over the top. ALEX SMITH 3.0

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted (edited)
57 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Sam either gets it = win

Sam Darnold isn't going to magically "get it". He has been the same catastrophe prone quarterback since USC. Please accept what is in front of you for the sake of what is left of your sanity. As for Baker. If he doesn't work out it's Corral and another draft pick if that doesn't yield the results we seek. But there is no scenario where Darnold is a franchise quarterback. This really isn't as complicated as you are making it.

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...