Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Article on why we should cut Darnold….am I wrong for being against this??


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

...I don't want to see Darnhold in a Panther Uni ever again...If Im the billionaire his azz would be gone... If our season is going so damn bad that we have to install him at QB...hell... just put Corral in at QB... he holds no value whatsoever...cut him.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I really don’t like the way Darnold is treated but he has to go earn it.  Cutting him is stupid

How he's treated? We picked up the fifth year option on the worst starting QB in the league after inexplicably trading for him. He's going to make $18M to hold a clipboard.

Sign me up for some of that treatment! 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WarPanthers89 said:

I don’t care how much they compete in practice, no way I’d take Sam starting over Baker no matter how they look in camp. Darnold has always been a strong practice guy….well maybe strong is the wrong word. The article questions Corrals development if he’s not number 2 compared to Sam being our primary backup. I would like for Corral to have a true redshirt year where he does not see the field at all and really gets time to grasp the NFL so that he has the best shot at long term success. If Matt was the primary backup and Baker goes down he could be thrown to the wolves and pick up some bad habits. Being that we picked him him in the third round there should be no pressure for him to perform immediately. 

This is my problem with ppl..

This needs to be said so ppl can stop living in fantasy world..

Matt Corral is a 3rd rd QB project.  Every QB in the 2022 draft (after Pickett) was seen as a project who needed to sit a year or 2.. The NFL has spoken and that's why these kids were drafted in the 3rd and not the 1st so there wasn't any pressure to throw these kids in the fire before they were ready..  Him sitting getting 3rd QB reps isn't a bad thing or is it hurting his development... Corral at this point is having problems getting snaps under Center and knowing the plays because he played in a Mickey mouse system in college... He has elite skill sets but him getting the mental game and developing his frail body to take NFL punishment is more important then him getting 2nd team reps his rookie year. Unless he proves he's Russell Wilson and that miracle happens for us.. The plan has always been to sit him Atleast a year..

Making Baker or Sam work for the job isn't a bad thing.. Some ppl here call it a farce competition.. Whatever...... 1 QB is making way more and they spent assets to get him..At the same time they've made it clear all offseason they were looking  for a upgrade...The better QB is only here for a bag of chips and he still had to take a contract hit. The New OC isn't a fan of either player. .. This is as fair competition as I've seen.. There is no attachment to either guy.. IMO this is the only time where it truly feels like "who ever give them the best chance to win will play" is a true statement that will be followed..

Edited by WOW!!
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pimpdaddy said:

...Ummm comon .... Sam sucks...quit trying to make anything about him legitimate .... He has no value. none. 

Stfu and use reading comprehension or just reading in general..

At what point did I say either were "good" QBs??.. Don't worry I'll wait. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, top dawg said:

I'm not against competition, and actually prefer it.

What I'm against is a farce of a competition. If that's even remotely on the radar, they can dump Darnold.

Darnold will look decent until he sees a real defense. It’s pointless to have a TC competition with him when the entire NFL knows he struggles in real game decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I'm not against competition, and actually prefer it.

What I'm against is a farce of a competition. If that's even remotely on the radar, they can dump Darnold.

Just a question.. What makes this a farce competition?? 

They literally have no attachment to either player...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Many Panthers fans are already excited about second-round selection Nic Scourton for a variety of reasons including but not limited to: the Panthers needed to recharge the position group, Scourton had a late first-round grade according to many (including the Panthers), and he fit this season's modus operandi of stopping the run now and forever. However, Scourton was seen early on as one of the top-3 EDGE guys in this class but fell due to not having quite the season at Texas A&M as he did prior at Purdue (his sophomore season). It's been revealed since then a few different things that speak to that dip in production... Texas A&M, for one, requires each player on their line to be able to hold two gaps. This also explains why we saw low production across the board from the other two TA&M prospects but were still being heavily touted. Scourton was also said to have bulked up to 280lbs in order to fulfill this role and noticeably suffered from it. He's expected to play this season with Carolina at 255 - 260 which is very different from most situations. In most situations, teams are wanting players to gain 15 - 30. Since Scourton is going to be playing at his Purdue weight, I thought it would make sense to dive more into that tape. Y'all... we might have gotten something special... Let's take a quick peek at the stats before we start drooling over some highlights. First, a summary of the last two seasons for Scourton: Second, the game splits: The first thing that pops up for me is how Scourton's sack numbers were cut in half his senior year. We've already pointed out issues with scheme that impacted the TA&M linemen from racking up numbers, but seeing the game splits it's clear that Scourton didn't exactly feast on inferior competition while at Purdue. He had two two-sack games (vs. Michigan (2023 - 2024 champs), Indiana) and a 10-tackle game (vs. Nebraska). I also see the 2024 games where he went up against two top-10 tackles (Will Campbell from LSU + Armand Membou from Missouri) that I watched leading up to the draft.  For those who just want a summary: Scourton looked elite at Purdue and is going to be rotating in often during his rookie campaign. I originally had him penciled in as the second-string, strong-side edge defender behind Clowney but I wouldn't be surprised to see the team have him and Pat Jones II moving around when they rotate in in order to find where Nic looks best. Here's a highlight reel to replace that Cialias you lost in your recliner tonight:   For those that like to use their own eyes: Below I'll be linking the linking the five games I've mentioned above. If you plan to watch all of them, I highly recommend going in the order listed as that will allow you to see him vs. Campbell and then Membou while dealing with the aforementioned things he dealt with at Texas A&M before seeing him look unstoppable in 2023 when he was allowed to play both at a comfortable weight and in a scheme that didn't require him two cover two gaps nearly every play. vs. Will Campbell (2024) vs. Armand Membou (2024) vs. Nebraska (2023) vs. Michigan (2023)   vs. Indiana (2023)  
    • Yea, i honestly think he had almost as much say as Dan.  One of the main reasons I think that is Eager has said before he was ever with the Panthers, that you trade away picks for a qb and for any other position you do pick swaps, and that's exactly what we did.
    • For a LB that is a long career.  They take a beating.  Shoulders and head.  My favorite LB of All Time--Junior Seau--had a 20-year career--the average career for a STARTING MLB is 5.6 years.  I really think Shaq is done, but if he can play, it does not mean that he should.   Think about Morgan's career--7 seasons.  Luke's career--8 seasons.  Beason played only 93 games over 10 years--only 5 seasons where he played 15 games or more.  The other 5 seasons?  No more than 5 games per.  So basically, the average starting MLB plays 90 games in his career.  Shaq has played 123 games and was pretty injury free until the last 2 seasons (6 games total). 
×
×
  • Create New...