Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Carolina Panthers are owned by a Dan Snyder clone


tiger7_88
 Share

Recommended Posts

He's not Snyder level yet but very few in this thread willing to defend him. He has been wrong on every decision, and is trying to stiff a bunch businesses over the practice facility fiasco. Hope they stick it to him and he is forced to sell.  Seems like a Snyder in training right now and sexual harassment claims would not surprise me.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

Behind Closed Doors:  A Fly on the Wall Perspective of NFL Owner Daniel Snyder at Work

 

 

Somebody placed a hidden camera in the Foreskins' headquarters?

Funny, I watched that movie again for the first time in ages on Sunday.  I am still laughing about parts of it three days later.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Snyder? No. Jerry Jones lite possibly.

 

5 hours ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I don't see it. He may be too involved, but he's never gone out of his way to be in front of cameras, interviewed, nor has he pretended to be the GM in the draft room.

I don't even really see any credible evidence that he's "too involved", in fact I see reports and actions to the contrary. Sure, he was highly involved with the Rhule hire, but what owner isn't involved in that level of hire? I would presume that he was highly involved with the GM's hire as well.  But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

I don't even really see any credible evidence that he's "too involved", in fact I see reports and actions to the contrary. Sure, he was highly involved with the Rhule hire, but what owner isn't involved in that level of hire? I would presume that he was highly involved with the GM's hire as well.  But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

Involved with the coaching search is scary enough for me. It's going to take a lot to make up for his trust in Hurney and his lust for Watson.  Not to mention the RH fiasco. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PantherPhann89 said:

For me, the jury is still out on Tepper's ownership. Yes, he believed in Rhule and showed his support of Rhule with money and control. Being wrong, maybe, doesn't make him a bad owner, nor does not firing Rhule when there's a lot of financial commitment remaining in his contract. 

I don't know all of the in's and out's of the Rockhill situation. But like I said,  for me,  it's still up in the air. 

This.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

the GM literally said yesterday that Tepper would be involved in who they actually decide to start at QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Involved with the coaching search is scary enough for me. It's going to take a lot to make up for his trust in Hurney and his lust for Watson.  Not to mention the RH fiasco. 

Fair! Though I will say that he was still just dipping his toe in the water with Hurney. He was going through the motions of an inevitable conclusion. I'm not going to ding him for not having enough experience or being cerebral before reacting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CRA said:

the GM literally said yesterday that Tepper would be involved in who they actually decide to start at QB. 

He also literally said in that same exact answer, that Rhule has final say.  Which is exactly what was literally said in the post you quoted that you're trying to refute. Lol.

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

But it appears that he lets the football guys have the final word on football issues. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, top dawg said:

Snyder is a straight up sleezeball and crook. He's also low-key meddlesome (or at least has been). 

You could switch "Snyder" with "Tepper," and this still makes perfect sense. Tepper has absolutely been prone to knee-jerk decisions. All things considered with injuries, Tepper has had a different starting QB take most of the snaps every year he's owned the team.

2018: Cam Newton
2019: Kyle Allen
2020: Teddy Bridgewater
2021: Sam Darnold
2022: Baker Mayfield

If anything, he's trained what's left of the fanbase to know not to buy a Mayfield jersey now, to wait until December, when they're $29.99 at Dick's Sporting Goods, and to apply the same approach to Carson Wentz's jersey next year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

He also literally said in that same exact answer, that Rhule has final say.  Which is exactly what was literally said in the post you quoted that you're trying to refute. Lol.

 

I don't think Tepper's deference to Rhule is the plus that you're implying it is. If anything, it underscores his ineptitude even more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...