Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Training Camp Wednesday 8-10 Discussion

rayzor

By rayzor,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

who cares what it looks like though? haha. If they know what the plan is inside of those 4 walls, isnt that all that matters? Not what he is telling the press...

If we are judging football teams based on looking goofy... then Bill Belichick's sleeveless hoody looks goofy, Josh McDaniel's oversized jumpsuits look goofy, Cam Newton's outfits sometimes looked goofy, Payton Manning is a goofy person, and Sean Payton wore eye liner!

hahah. They are just words, and they get people so worked up.

People get worked up not because of specific statements, but because they don't trust Matt Rhule.

And frankly, what reason has he given anybody to trust him?

Complain all you want about people's attitudes, but until the team actually shows that it can be something other than mediocre garbage under his coaching, there's no reason to see it any differently.

I mean hell, do you want people to stay positive about Sam Darnold too?

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Natural Experienced

The Natural

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Perhaps, but there's nothing to prevent you from simply saying "no" if he isn't.

You don't give a straight answer either way so it doesn't bite your ass later down the road with hypothetical coaches in the future. If you give a definitive answer this time it will be expected in the future and can lead to an awkward situation. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Granted, it probably would help if Rhule didn't say stupid sh-t like "the process is working, you just can't see it" 😖

It would work if Rhule talked about stuff he knows, like eating, playing golf, etc.

No matter what the question just respond with

" I love a good piece of steak and baked potato"

"Oh thanks, I really pride myself on my golf game, You know I played a round with (insert panther player) a couple of days ago"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, BrianS said:

Doesn't matter.  I don't think Walker is eligible, and Corral would never make it past waivers to be on the PS.  Somebody is getting cut.

I truly believe this is the only reason they are giving Sam reps with the 1s. No way Rhule cuts PJ. 

Sam will be dealt (not likely) or cut. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
Just now, BrianS said:

Doesn't matter.  I don't think Walker is eligible, and Corral would never make it past waivers to be on the PS.  Somebody is getting cut.

Hard to say. They've tinkered with the PS rules so much over the last few years it's gotten way more complicated than it used to be.

I would expect Walker to likely fit as a veteran exception, but I haven't looked over what the rules are for this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poundaway Grand Master

poundaway

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

From yesterday, but I'll go ahead and throw it in here.

Panther GM Scott Fitterer is asked whether Matt Rhule is under any kind of mandate. He ducks the question.

 

This is one of the better team's I've been around.

I think our culture is really strong and that comes down to Matt and the coaching staff and what he's built here.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This is one of the better team's I've been around.

I think our culture is really strong and that comes down to Matt and the coaching staff and what he's built here.


 

Year 3 was always the true 1st year of evaluation unless he had pulled an Urban Meyer. The Panthers were garbage under Rivera in Years 1 and 2. Rhule has a history that shows Year 3 is the year where his program results in wins.

If it's more of the same, Rhule will likely be fired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This is one of the better team's I've been around.

I think our culture is really strong and that comes down to Matt and the coaching staff and what he's built here.

This means nothing. What do you expect him to tell the media, the culture sucks, the guys aren't buying in, and Matt is a dumbass that doesn't have a clue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, poundaway said:

This is one of the better team's I've been around.

I think our culture is really strong and that comes down to Matt and the coaching staff and what he's built here.


 

He still failed to address the question in any way. Having guys that like each other and that 'fot the culture' is great and grand but doesn't amount to jack if the culture' doesn't equate to winning games... to date, Rhule has proven wholly ineffective in that key area. That's the litmus test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saca312
      In addition to Evero there's one large change that likely should happen.

      By Saca312 · Posted

      It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Puresteel55
      Carolina Panthers pick No. 19-2026 NFL Draft

      By Puresteel55 · Posted

      Bryce Boetcher
    • TylerDurden
      CBS Sports brief discussion about questionable Canales decision making

      By TylerDurden · Posted

      Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...