Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

To everyone already calling Corral some booty


TheoJay10
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

100 percent, everyone keeps stating that a new coach will bring in his own QB… well Rhule isn’t exactly coaching like it’s a make or break season for him.

As big a Rhule critic as I am, he probably is smarter to not coach like he's desperate, even though I agree he absolutely ought to be on the hot seat.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mc52beast said:

Why am I not shocked that after one preseason game where Matt is playing with 3rd stringers that the football experts at the Huddle are calling him a bust… y’all are hilarious.

Hes not a bust yet but he's also pretty far from a rookie savior like some believed, he's a rookie 3rd rounder with limited reps transitioning from a college rpo scheme..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, The Huddler said:

i have zero worry

 

dude has had next to zero reps and was playing with a bunch of dudes who will all be on couches in a month

 

let him sit and learn this year while we try to win with baker

He had more action today than probably all of training camp, where he's essentially been an afterthought. How else is he supposed to play?

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Krovvy said:

The problem is he showed nothing. It's why everyone is upset.

If he came away with the same stats, but looked like he could navigate the pocket, had decent footwork, and could drive the ball then people wouldn't be worried. However, he didn't, he looked shaky on every snap.

people are upset because they claim him the future of the franchise like a bunch of madden players who don’t know poo, wanting him to start lol

once again we will be lucky if he is a good backup and yes it will take time why so hard to understand if you haven’t spent even a little time following football?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, onmyown said:

people are upset because they claim him the future of the franchise like a bunch of madden players who don’t know poo, wanting him to start lol

once again we will be lucky if he is a good backup and yes it will take time why so hard to understand if you haven’t spent even a little time following football?

I've spent a little time following football, and I can tell you that in that time, I've yet to see a third round rookie who only got a minimum number of practice snaps come in and look like an All Pro.

I don't know what Corral is yet, but I do know that judging him off of today, especially given the way that Matt Rhule has handled his development to date, is extremely premature.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BIGH2001 said:

Darnold and especially PJs reps should be going more to Corral. If the plan was to bring in a veteran QB and draft a rookie I have no clue why PJ was even brought back. 

I get bringing him back at the time... But it does feel like he's not gonna make it to the regular season roster. I'm hoping speculation yesterday was to help him land some place else is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mav1234 said:

I get bringing him back at the time... But it does feel like he's not gonna make it to the regular season roster. I'm hoping speculation yesterday was to help him land some place else is true.

I get wanting to advertise him for a trade but he won’t fetch more than a late round pick and maybe $1 or $2 million of his contract. The question is, is that worth taking away reps from your new starter (who fumbled on an exchange and had a misread with one of his WRs) and hindering your rookies development. Just cut PJ (or put him on the practice squad if we can) and let Sam be the backup. If someone wants to trade for him it won’t be hard to bump or PJ or sign a vet of his caliber. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I get wanting to advertise him for a trade but he won’t fetch more than a late round pick and maybe $1 or $2 million of his contract. The question is, is that worth taking away reps from your new starter (who fumbled on an exchange and had a misread with one of his WRs) and hindering your rookies development. Just cut PJ (or put him on the practice squad if we can) and let Sam be the backup. If someone wants to trade for him it won’t be hard to bump or PJ or sign a vet of his caliber. 

Yeah that "theory" is really retarded.  But we are dealing with Matt Rhule so who knows.   Its just crystal clear rhule has no idea how to run a modern day NFL team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Yeah that "theory" is really retarded.  But we are dealing with Matt Rhule so who knows.   Its just crystal clear rhule has no idea how to run a modern day NFL team.

It’s definitely some “players’ coach, building competitive culture” BS that may work in college but not the NFL. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

I get bringing him back at the time... But it does feel like he's not gonna make it to the regular season roster. I'm hoping speculation yesterday was to help him land some place else is true.

From what I hear it was, but it really shouldn't be.

Matt Rhule is 100% responsible for helping Matt Corral get up to speed as a pro.

He has zero responsibility to help PJ Walker find another job.

If he's devoting practice time to a goal that's not part of his job while another goal that is his job suffers, he should be fired today.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

From what I hear it was, but it really shouldn't be.

Matt Rhule is 100% responsible for helping Matt Corral get up to speed as a pro.

He has zero responsibility to help PJ Walker find another job.

If he's devoting practice time to a goal that's not part of his job while another goal that is his job suffers, he should be fired today.

yep,  and the poster who said this helps the vibe in the locker room knowing rhule has your back is clinically insane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...