Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dolphins TE on the trade block


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I get that we are not a fan of Ian getting a new contract, but in what way is it "big?" He is the 24th highest paid tight end in the league, and only 1.5% of our total cap. 

I guess because most think of Thomas as a second string guy at best that shouldn't be paid like a starter.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Big enough as in you’re not going to pay him that deal And another big TE contract 

I disagree. His cap hit is 3million this year. There are backups in this league who make the same as Ian on a per year basis. I dont think that impacts whether we can afford another tight end at all. Other teams are doing it. 

Nick Boyle Ravens 29 $9,750,000 $4,875,000 $3,750,000 $3,750,000 2024 UFA
Cameron Brate Buccaneers 31 $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 2024 Void
Marcedes Lewis Packers 38 $8,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,100,000 $2,100,000 2023 Void
Robert Tonyan Packers 28 $3,750,000 $3,750,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 2023 Void
O.J. Howard Bills 28 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,195,000 $3,195,000 2023 Void
Hayden Hurst Bengals 29 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 2023 UFA
Durham Smythe Dolphins 27 $7,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 2024 UFA
Geoff Swaim Titans 29 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 2023 Void
Pharaoh Brown Texans 28 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 2023 UFA
Chris Manhertz Jaguars 30 $6,650,000 $3,325,000 $4,250,000 $4,250,000 2023 UFA
Noah Fant Seahawks 25 $12,590,724 $3,147,681 $12,590,724 $12,590,724 2024 UFA
Dan Arnold Jaguars 27 $6,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 2023 UFA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

I guess because most think of Thomas as a second string guy at best that shouldn't be paid like a starter.

He isnt paid like a starter. He is paid like backup that can start. Nowhere near what starters actually make in this league. For example: The TCV of a starting TE in the NFL right now is 60-75million... Ian is getting 20million. 

Edited by TheCasillas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

He isnt paid like a started. He is paid like backup that can start. Nowhere near what starters actually make in this league. For example: The TCV of a starting TE in the NFL right now is 60-75million... Ian get 20million. 

You said he was the 24th highest paid TE in the league. That is starter money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...