Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You're the GM.... What are you looking for in other team cuts


 Share

Recommended Posts

Need DT help. I like McCall but I’m not willing to bet on him over 17 games. 
 

Def need a pass rusher. Imo the marquis haynes experiment has run its course and I wouldn’t mind seeing him cut and a couple edge rushers brought in. 
 

Kicker obviously 

 

I’d love to see a TE but they seem to like Ian Thomas for whatever reason and hopefully Tremble breaks out this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have to grab a K and a QB--K for now, QB because we should be constantly looking for a backup QB.  Let's face it, injured Sam, inconsistent Walker, and uninspiring Corral (going to IR) is not solid depth for now, worse next year when Walker and Darnold are gone.  I think we have DE depth that is equivalent to the quality we'd get from cuts. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

I think you have to grab a K and a QB--K for now, QB because we should be constantly looking for a backup QB.  Let's face it, injured Sam, inconsistent Walker, and uninspiring Corral (going to IR) is not solid depth for now, worse next year when Walker and Darnold are gone.  I think we have DE depth that is equivalent to the quality we'd get from cuts. 

 

I agree. Lots of folks are iffy on the edge but I like the depth.  Burns, Barno, YGM and Hayes is decent. Tight end has questions according to some but I like the guys ok. I think Ricci has earned a spot and Sullivan has potential.  

Not many teams will carry three qbs so somebody will slip through the cracks that could help.  With Darnold and Corral on the IR we might need to see who comes available.  Kicker is the main priority.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...