Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Am I crazy or has Lovett out played Chuba?


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

My biggest problem with Chuba is that despite his size (6'1 over 200), he's not one for contact.  He goes down pretty much as soon as he is touched, according to my observation.  That was true last year, and it still appears to be true.  Now, I know he's still young, but I should have seen some improvement in that area after a year of NFL weight training.  I would be completely cool if he didn't make the final roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Stuart Smith said:

I see I am not alone in remembering Chubba was Rhule’s wife’s pick. Joke on draft night because he did so well against Baylor. 

I bet Rhule regrets making that joke now - so many fans have taken it literally. 

Hubbard ran for 2k yards in 2019 (before his injury), including going for 170 yards against Baylor. The pick was justified. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I mean Chinn, shi, Brady, Brandon smith, Keith Taylor, and tommy tremble seem to be solid mid round pickups.

Chinn is exceptional but the 2nd round isn't "mid round."

Shi, BC and Tremble are potential long term starter material. 

The book is still out on Taylor and Smith. TBD.

I am not suggesting we have been incapable of drafting anyone outside of the 1st round but that their success level seems to be rather Hurney-esque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, OldhamA said:

I bet Rhule regrets making that joke now - so many fans have taken it literally. 

Hubbard ran for 2k yards in 2019 (before his injury), including going for 170 yards against Baylor. The pick was justified. 

It wasn't exactly a joke.  He retold a conversation between him and his wife regarding Hubbard. He said he and his wife were talking and she mentioned how good Chuba looked when he played against Baylor and that the Panthers should think about drafting him.  Obviously she has no power on this team and Rhule certainly could have kept that conversation to himself.  Possibly the Panthers were planning on taking him anyway.  Point being, unless Rhule fabricated the story, the yes, Mrs. Rhule "told" him to draft Cuba.  I bet now Rhule wishes he had never shared the story with the media. 

Also offensive stats in the Big XII are often inflated...it's a 'heavy on offense and lite on defense' conference historically.  That's why Texas Tech QBs rarely pan out in the NFL (Mahomes being one of the very few) even though they put up stupid stats just about every season.  Spread offenses create natural running lanes and with more DBs than LBs on the field, getting to the second level and breaking some tackles is a bit easier than running against defenses, say, in the Big 10.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

I bet Rhule regrets making that joke now - so many fans have taken it literally. 

Hubbard ran for 2k yards in 2019 (before his injury), including going for 170 yards against Baylor. The pick was justified. 

College stats don't equal NFL success. Hubbard is a very obvious example of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Jesus.....what's the scoop?

He was heavily recruited by Matt himself and signed to Baylor. When Matt got the Panthers job, he decommitted and transfered to Penn State.  They stayed in touch while he was in college and Matt and him are *tight

Edited by saX man
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would imagine mid to late draft picks don't have a high success rate in general.  I doubt it's just a Panthers thing.  That range is usually special teamers/depth players.  That's why I'm all for using one on OL every year.  Norwell, BC (although I think he was a 3rd), now possible Mayes all seem like good players (Mayes is still undecided but looks good so far).  The Pats usually do a good job developing quality OL with late round picks.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, outside the first round it seems like we are making a very Hurney-esque effort. We seem to be using later round "swing for the fences" strategy of recruiting outlier athletes. 

I'm not anti-high caliber athlete but it does seem like we often prioritize measurables over playing ability.  

Don't kid yourself even the first round picks haven't been good Fit is a sham GM who should be replaced when Matt is he couldn't get a gm job for 25 years you know who else couldn't? Dave Gettleman

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DMathematics said:

Don't kid yourself even the first round picks haven't been good Fit is a sham GM who should be replaced when Matt is he couldn't get a gm job for 25 years you know who else couldn't? Dave Gettleman

I don't think it's very fair to judge Fitterer yet since he is more of an assistant GM than a real GM. Once Rhule is gone and assuming he is finally able to claim a traditional GM role, then he can be judged accordingly. 

Rhule has final say, so I believe he does deserve final blame. I am a little skeptical of Fitterer but he isn't getting the same opportunity that most NFL GM's are.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

I feel like too many of our draft picks just wouldn't be taken by most other teams.

 

Hubbard being one 

And it feels like we are always taking these guys (chuba, long snapper, TMJ) instead of addressing our needs on the line. Starting center,  All-pro guard or a skill guy that we might cut in two years, hmmm?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't think it's very fair to judge Fitterer yet since he is more of an assistant GM than a real GM. Once Rhule is gone and assuming he is finally able to claim a traditional GM role, then he can be judged accordingly. 

Rhule has final say, so I believe he does deserve final blame. I am a little skeptical of Fitterer but he isn't getting the same opportunity that most NFL GM's are.

His tittle is GM if he's not being offered GM duties than he should've never taken the job he's tied to this roster construction as much as Matt as far as I'm concerned. My issue is he can't even get the basic GM'in down what's our direction? Does he understand comp picks? We sure talk about them a lot but have never gotten any under the Rhule tender What about the crazy trades? This guy just throws away picks "In on every deal" but no deal has payed of for us yet.. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you think the NFL or NBA are worried about lawsuits or something like officiating scandals bringing down their empires, I think you're giving them way too much credit.  Go watch the documentary on Tim Donaghy in the NBA and who was involved and what he did.  One of the guys he worked with is still one of the league's top trusted officials, especially for playoff games.  IIRC, they have records showing he was the person Donaghy exchanged phone calls with the most during his time fixing games.  And his reputation is beyond horrible...  but he's untouchable.  I also encourage you to go watch DeMaurice Smith's Breakfast Club interview.  He laid out how for fans, we just know these organizations as a singular, public entity - like THE Carolina Panthers, or THE Dallas Cowboys- but, in actuality, he said that is the public-facing identity of an umbrella company comprised of countless smaller businesses and LLCs.  He is tasked with trying to audit their books, and he said these organizations are structured in such a way that even HE can't ever know what they truly make in a year.  It's impossible.  And now, this is just me speculating on top of that, but you think the league's themselves are structured similarly?  They are untouchable.  IIRC, they are recognized legally as "entertainment" organizations, thus protecting themselves in cases where integrity would come into question.  They are protected, layer, behind layer, behind layer.  Betting works because there is some degree of control that ensures the house wins more than it loses, by a lot.  The short of it is, "Give them bread and circuses" and all that jazz.  These leagues operate with total impunity.  Again, it's not just because I'm a Panthers fan, but even if I wasn't and I watched Superbowl 50 without a dog in the fight I would walk away feeling like that outcome was controlled and influenced HEAVILY to where the Panthers were not given a level playing field.  The same poo happens every Sunday to teams playing those blue blood franchises and ones with intriguing storylines. 
    • This Chuba isn't getting traded, but Rico very well could be in a few weeks if he keeps playing well in a tandem backfield with Chuba also playing well. I think we'd end up going with a two headed monster in that case, but with Rico being on a one year deal, it does open up the possibility of a contending team offering up a decent pick for him.  Depending on the recovery of Hampton, I could see someone like the Chargers giving us a 4th for him if they think he could put them over the top, he would fit nicely in a Harbaugh system I think. If it comes to that, we need to make that trade, as I can't see any way we re-sign Rico with all our other needs and getting Brooks back too.  And he's not going to get a contract big enough to get us any comp picks in return, especially if/when we sign a FA or two ourselves.  So if we're not going to bring him back, the prudent decision would really be to get a draft pick for him at the deadline.
    • It's all about what they do at QB. It's clear the rest of the roster is improving. If they commit long term to Young because he's being carried to wins then we're fuged. I think that's a separate issue to finally being competitive again.  There's no QB in this Draft that's going to ride in on his white horse on day one and save us, so we absolutely shouldn't be playing for Draft position. 
×
×
  • Create New...