Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC story


WarHeel
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, joemac said:

I dont recall him dropping any passes, ever.  Now, im sure it has happened, but his total drop numbers for his entire career have to be under 5. 

Two according to PFF.... And there was this streak he had of 23 games without one....

 

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2019/10/29/panthers-christian-mccaffrey-drops-pro-football-focus-2017/

 

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coreyl90 said:

We all know the coaching staff proactively sat CMC after his injuries because the previous two seasons were a lost cause. The people with the "he's always hurt" arguments are casual football fans at best.

He got hurt in the 3rd game of the season after having the highest usage in the NFL.  Not much proactive about that.  If they're really being proactive and saving him, why not just sit CMC starting week 1 this year until we see if the team has a shot at the playoffs?

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TrevorLaurenceTime22 said:

@frankw spent an entire thread arguing with me that it was the same...

Are you this lonely on a Friday bub? It's been established that after 25 years old many RB's begin to break down physically and get bogged down with nagging injuries. There have been some notable exceptions but most of them are from previous eras. You get so angry when presented with the realities of the very real trends related to the running back position the last several years. Yeah I hope McCaffrey miraculously goes on to never miss a game for the next 5 seasons and has a hall of fame career and a Super Bowl MVP with us. But I also want to hit the Powerball so the odds of both are about the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

He got hurt in the 3rd game of the season after having the highest usage in the NFL.  Not much proactive about that.  If they're really being proactive and saving him, why not just sit CMC starting week 1 this year until we see if the team has a shot at the playoffs?

That makes zero sense. You clearly don't understand what I was saying. 22 was held out even after he could have returned because the team was not in contention. They were not going to put their franchise RB on the field to take unnecessary hits in meaningless games  

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Coreyl90 said:

That makes zero sense. You clearly don't understand what I was saying. 22 was held out even after he could have returned because the team was not in contention. They were not going to put their franchise RB on the field to take unnecessary hits in meaningless games  

Your argument was that he's not always hurt.  He missed those games because he was hurt.  If the season was essentially over by the time he was ready to return, then why didn't he return earlier?  Because he was injured.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm really not stressing about upgrading from Bryce. I'm frustrated with our inability (or refusal) to recognize overall bad QB performance and failure to seriously address the issue. QB is the most impactful position on the field, and we're not only settling for what we've been given to this point, but we've rewarded it with a fully guaranteed 5th year extension for a player that's never played 2 NFL franchise QB quality games back to back in 3 seasons. I can't understand how that's ok from a coach's or GM's viewpoint. Successful franchises don't do things like this. It just doesn't make sense.  We do not have a top half of the league QB right now. Since we don't have that player, we should be looking for him. Pickett isn't it. Grier isn't it. Bryce hasn't proven he is yet. Until you have that sure fire franchise QB, you keep looking. You're not consistently making the playoffs, a deep run, or a SB appearance without one.  What's the worst that could happen? We end up with 2 potential number 1 QBs? How horrible. 
    • Easy to understand Pickett, if this is anywhere close to on point. Canales wants to get as close to Bryce as he can- get the pace and timing in the throws as close a he can to Bryce. So the other players don’t have to adjust so much, to a new guy.       If Cam was the 1, he would look for a rocket arm.  But Bryce is the 1. Look for limited in the same way.  Low velocity, plenty of air under it, feels just like home when Picket comes in. And you have the guys on the second team not having such a radical adjustment (if they have to play) like with Dalton to Bryce.    Enter Grier. I guess we will collect those types.   
    • Best part is if we draft him, we can also use him as our fourth and one QB sneaker
×
×
  • Create New...