Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Think Snow will defend his run D after today?


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

I mean did literally anyone think Cleveland wouldn’t run all over us?

This would've been the 2nd most rushing yards and the 2nd highest yards per carry that we gave up last year when we had a D built to rush the passer with stopping the run a complete afterthought. We focused on building a defensive roster that could better stop the run and this was the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This would've been the 2nd most rushing yards and the 2nd highest yards per carry that we gave up last year when we had a D built to rush the passer with stopping the run a complete afterthought. We focused on building a defensive roster that could better stop the run and this was the result.

It’s also D playcalling, we continued those cute 5/6 DB formations, Brown was doing nothing and Iannidis looked awful. Like, we should’ve at least tried to employ a 4 man front of our best defenders with 3 LBs at minimum w Chinn in the box. The defense made no sense today.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

It’s also D playcalling, we continued those cute 5/6 DB formations, Brown was doing nothing and Iannidis looked awful. Like, we should’ve at least tried to employ a 4 man front of our best defenders with 3 LBs at minimum w Chinn in the box. The defense made no sense today.

College staff doing college things.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like I heard there was supposed to be an emphasis on creating turnovers.   Don't remember seeing any of those.  I do think Snow is over his head here.  But I will give the D credit...despite being on the field most of the game...they were playing well enough to win in the 2nd half...just could not overcome the refs.

Edited by ladypanther
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ladypanther said:

Seems like I heard there was supposed to be an emphasis on creating turnovers.   Don't remember seeing any of those.  I do think Snow is over his head here.  But I will give the D credit...despite being on the field most of the game...they were playing well enough to win in the 2nd half...just could not overcome the refs.

Not their fault Snow rushed 4 and played zone when it was obvious blitzing worked when they tried it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To kick this up, The Athletic has a really comprehensive piece out where pretty much all QB questions are addressed. It is worth seeing.  https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7083539/2026/03/04/starting-quarterback-projections-free-agency-draft/?source=user_shared_article I’m putting something specific here but it should have a thread or something. It is an extensive exercise.  This is a dense write up with a lot of column inches used, about the Jets and Murray and Reich, all this stuff.. then it goes to backup QB and there is Dalton.  I am pasting that part: As for Dalton, Reich is installing the offense he was trying to run in Carolina in 2023 before he got fired, and Dalton was with the Panthers then; he’s an ideal option as a veteran backup to replace Taylor. Reich said this about Dalton in 2023: “The way he's throwing the football, the way he works through progressions, the way he handles the operation. … Since day one (when) he walked in the door, I'm like, 'This guy is starter-worthy.' You guys know I've said that all along. He's, in my opinion, one of the best 32 quarterbacks in the world.” ——— That’s true love lol. I never heard any of this. Pretty crazy I think, considering how the year went.   Anyway the dream is not dead. . 
    • The Seahawks traded for wide receiver/returner Rashid Shaheed at the trade deadline. He proved to be a key acquisition. Shaheed returned a punt and a kickoff for touchdowns in the regular season and had a 95-yard kickoff return in the postseason. Shaheed, though, is scheduled for free agency. So, the 12 games he played, including the postseason, might be the extent of his time in Seattle. Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that Shaheed and the Seahawks are not close to an extension, and the expectation is that the two-time Pro Bowler will hit free agency. Shaheed has 153 receptions for 2,243 yards and 12 touchdowns in his four-year career to go along with three punt return touchdowns and a kickoff return touchdown. He ranks 13th on PFT’s top-100 free agents. https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profootballtalk/rumor-mill/news/report-rashid-shaheed-appears-headed-to-free-agency
×
×
  • Create New...