Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rhule says the Panthers averaged 7.7 yards per play the last 35 minutes of the game; adds that would've been 3rd in the league last week.


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

The thing is Matt Rhule might not even be fired. If you listened to Tepper and his presser last year he said when he hired Matt Rhule that they BOTH knew it would be a "5 year plan". I don't know how Tepper keeps getting conned by a used car salesman. Rhule used us being 2nd in the league in passing yards allowed as a metric for showing that the defense improved since he got here when we were 21st in scoring allowed. And Tepper actually believes the BS coming out of his mouth. He's getting played. Teams know we can't stop the run so that's all they do because they don't have to pass the ball along with them constantly having short fields last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, WarHeel said:

I caught that in the presser. He thinks he’s a smooth talker but most are seeing through the BS. I like stats too. Let’s drop the one about 4th Quarter Comebacks under Rhule and see if we generate the same positivity.

To be fair, that game will go down as a 4QC for Baker.  We did take the lead.  Our defense and the refs simply conspired to hand it back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

They only get logged as a 4QC if you win or tie I believe 

I think you're right, at least as far as PFR is concerned.  I always thought 4QC was taking the lead with a score in the 4th quarter, and GWD was taking the lead and subsequently winning.  Nevertheless, it was nice to see our offense take the ball down and score in the 4th.  It's been a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A team should do everything they can to prop up their investment in a QB regardless of who it is. 
    • I am not wanting to be too judgemental of Morgan over his first draft given the circumstances.  People don’t like my rationale but you know, I don’t so much like theirs either.  I was adamantly against drafting Bryce and very resentful over the extreme (imo) measures taken to prop him up. I feel like Dan got caught in that trap with demands or conditions placed on him to help out the QB and the new Offensive minded head coach.  And my biased opinion is that it was still all Bryce centric. Micro managed and solely focused on making him a viable player after his first disastrous season. Mandated to help the offense in that draft.  I feel like my speculation is reasonable given the climate and situation, and it includes the reasons we didn’t take a C, the reasons we overdrafted a RB and that particular WR. It was totally need based. Perceived needs. All to maximize Bryce.    And if it were me, and I wanted the GM slot of my team that I came up with, I would be willing to accede to the agenda that I feel was in place. The goals he had to meet.  It is pretty simple, just put Bryce’s needs at the center of everything that was done and work your way through it.  I have no idea or inside info, and people have mocked my opinion for it but that is what it is, it still makes sense to me. 
    • We can’t lose this guy he is the brains behind the operation 
×
×
  • Create New...