Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Giants: The Previous Game is Under Review


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

You mean that same Danny Dimes who was catching Passes against us last year 

we got the piss beat out of us last year by Joe Judge. Daboll is a better coach. 34-7 NYG

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Careful now, you'll upset the Huddle negativity.

Edited by 3838
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I skimmed the game and it's still strange to see the Giants running a lot of 3-4, but it looks different with Wink running it. The interior rush looks solid so I think Elf and guards will have a tougher game than last week, but Ikem and Moton should be able to hold up a lot better on the edges. Wink's scheme also relies on man coverage and the Giants CB's room isn't really built for that. So yes I agree with OP, attack the CB's, get CMC outside, Baker scrambling right like he likes to do might actually work a little bit better against this D than CLE. Very different D than last week outside of both of them having not great CB's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

I disagree and I really dont think using a team's performance from last year should ever be a measuring stick for how they will perform the next year. ie Packers v Vikings ... last year 37-10 and this year 7-23. 

Until this Sunday's game is played recent results still have relevancy and he played well against us and he's off to a nice start this season. Let's shut him down then trash talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, jayflip said:

Thabkd @TheCasillasfantastic write up!

My only hope is that Rhule & co saw what you saw and will exploit the weaknesses you saw. Lol. 

I hope Rhule and the rest of the coaching staff are at least as capable of watching and breaking down film as our man TheCasillas here.  If not, we're in serious trouble. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I know it's only been training camp and one preseason game, but I think T-Mac has already shown his floor to be exactly what I said about him in the pre-draft process. That his floor if he never improves his game, is as one of the best #2 WRs in the NFL, if not even still a low end #1 (i.e. a 25th-ish best WR in the league). I think it's safe to say he's already established himself as our #1, and there are only a small handful of teams in the league where I don't think he'd be their starting #2 WR in Week 1. Bengals (Higgins), Dolphins (Waddle), Eagles (Smith), Bucs (Godwin if healthy), Rams (Adams) are really the only teams where I think he'd be the #3 as a rookie in Week 1.  A few others like the Lions (Williams), Bears (Odunze), Seahawks (Kupp), Commanders (Deebo), where he'd be the 2b to start the season, just because they're vets and/or already have a year or two of experience with their team/QB. And even having said that, I think by year 2, he's better than every one of those players (And no, I'm not saying he's already going to be better than a prime version of Adams, just whatever he'll be at 33 next year), and same goes for Kupp, but that's more because it seems like his body might be quitting on him in a way that hasn't happened to Adams (yet).
    • Well to be fair, Horn not practicing right now to let his stitches heal up from a car accident isn't something that should be concerning.  Sure, you don't want him missing practice leading into the season, but it's one that once healed, won't have lingering affects or fear of re-injuring it, it was just bad luck.
    • Quality backups are absolutely important. This franchise has been plagued with depth problems. That said, there is a little bit of dismay that Mays can't beat out a 1-legged man, and all the talk going into the off-season was how BC would certainly be gone since he had position versatility.  In the end, it doesn't matter too awfully much, as I would be shocked to no end if Corbett makes it through the season. We know what we have in reserve, and that should surely be better than trying to sign random fat guys mid season to try and take over.
×
×
  • Create New...