Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We improved the staff, so WTF is going on?


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

The team has looked completely unprepared for the first halves of both of the last two games. No one here can pinpoint exactly why because we’re not in those practices and not in that locker room day-in and out. That said, we can judge the result and it seems like sporadic talent is the only thing keeping this team competitive at this point. The game plans have been crazy limited. Not sure we even have a go to for third and long. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

The guy that shouldve been DROY at LB, Rhule has dropping back deep. This alone should get him fired.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

That is fuging insane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

How we got Tabor and Hekker to come here I have no clue, and Rhule nearly negates it by putting Chuba at kick returner. Everything else sucks, I don't think we can totally blame Wilks for secondary issues when Snow is running this backwards as poo at safety

 

That usage of Chinn is just mind-boggling. What a waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

That Cody twitter thread is feeling more and more believable 

I didnt believe it in its entirety, but definitely felt the majority of it was true, and all of it was likely rooted in truth but may have been a bit embellished...  now?  I agree, all of it seems more and more concrete.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Proudiddy said:

I didnt believe it in its entirety, but definitely felt the majority of it was true, and all of it was likely rooted in truth but may have been a bit embellished...  now?  I agree, all of it seems more and more concrete.

yeah Cody is kind of a dumbass and has a flare for the dramatic, but they've had a youtube show for like 10 years and never claim to have sources or anything so at the least I think they believe whoever told them that story. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...