Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just a friendly reminder about today's victory...


TylerDurden
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yeah, we probably just cost ourselves draft position. We aren't winning many games with the offense we're fielding right now. We basically need the other team to beat themselves and the Saints did that today.

LOL

Talking about draft position after week 3. 

Huddle gonna huddle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I mean it doesn't exactly take a genius to see why.  This year is very similar to 2010's "lame duck" year under Fox and Pickles.  It's a waste.  If that is not already obvious to you, then give it a couple more weeks.

Because Baker is clearly the answer.  I mean we WON yesterday!  Whoot!  Watch out Super Bowl here we come!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We didn’t win because we were the better team, we didn’t out coach them. They beat themselves. Winston sucked, playing injured, they made mistakes, our defense gave up a lot, besides a few players playing well they didn’t do that good. Our offense was garbage but now because we won, Rhule going to act like he Bill Belicheat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The next 3 of 4 games are at home.  The Panthers better make good on that because after Tampa (last one in that home stand) of the final 10 games, only 4 are at home.  I see 3 maybe 4 wins in that final stretch of 10 games.  If Rhule wants to eclipse his 5 win mark, he's going to need this team to pull off some upsets in this upcoming home stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Who is ever as objective as they think they are. And let's be real most folks staying negative are hardly objective. They have negative opinions and keep them despite what happens. 

At this point, 11-25 and the declining performance the past 2 years absolutely leads to an objectively negative overall outlook. In the barest, most mathematical terms the trend has been negative and the offense still objectively sucks. That's the reality, and a single win over the Saints doesn't change that either subjectively or objectively.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KSpan said:

At this point, 11-25 and the declining performance the past 2 years absolutely leads to an objectively negative overall outlook. In the barest, most mathematical terms the trend has been negative and the offense still objectively sucks. That's the reality, and a single win over the Saints doesn't change that either subjectively or objectively.

No that just points out the past not the future. Much like depression when you look back you see what happened not what is going to happen. It doesn't mean that the future has to be better because it might not but it doesn't have to be bad. And  when you say you are negative about the future that is an emotional response not a factual statement.  You may say your viewpoint is informed by facts but that cuts both ways. I can say that we are two 50 yard plus  field goals away from 3-0. And how many teams have lost 2 games in a row by game winning field goals of over 50 yards in the history of the league. The answer is none.  So we lost our first 2 games with worse luck than any team in the history of the league and we should be all gloom and doom? So while you can find objective facts to inform your opinion on both sides, having a negative attitude is not being objective at this point.

Edited by panthers55
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

No that just points out the past not the future. Much like depression when you look back you see what happened not what is going to happen. It doesn't mean that the future has to be better because it might not but it doesn't have to be bad. And  when you say you are negative about the future that is an emotional response not a factual statement.  You may say your viewpoint is informed by facts but that cuts both ways. I can say that we are two 50 yard plus  field goals away from 3-0. And how many teams have lost 2 games in a row by game winning field goals of over 50 yards in the history of the league. The answer is none.  So we lost our first 2 games with worse luck than any team in the history of the league and we should be all gloom and doom? So while you can find objective facts to inform your opinion on both sides, having a negative attitude is not being objective at this point.

And even if this team had achieved a 3-0 record, which we actually saw last year before they finished 5-12, it would still be completely outweighed by the two years prior. It takes time to confidently discern changes in trends and Rhule has 2 years of empirical suckitude to fight against; 3 games scraping by against the bottom of the NFL barrel does little to move the objective or subjective needle in the face of that. I will again say that reviewing the data constitutes neither 'doom and gloom' nor that negativity is an emotional response... that's an absurd premise. For the millionth time, drawing a conclusion from the body of data out there does not constitute an active decision to be negative. The reality is that Rhule and his teams have sucked and this year's iteration appears to have the same weaknesses as those teams; this is based on what's actually being put on the field, not on any 'emotional response.'

Estimation (either positive or negative) of future performance is speculation and the 36 games he's already coached point in a pretty clear direction. The benefit of the doubt is gone, so unless/until he (or any other coach/player in a similar situation) gets a substantial body of work rivaling the performance showing a different trend, there's nothing to suggest the future will be any different and expectations can be set accordingly. It really is that simple.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, hepcat said:

When was the last time they beat the Panthers? 2013??

They have a better shot a beating us this year but as you know you can't predict these things.  Early season games are hard to predict. Until every team hits their so called strid (whether good or bad) it's still early. 

But with the way our offense is playing it's hard for me to imagine them playing much better than what we saw yesterday.  The defense is going to have to carry this team that's all there is to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...