Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Shenault get more playing time?


YourLastThought
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Robbie is the leading receiver and Smith hasn't done anything to warrant being a starter yet. 

Robbie is our leading receiver based off one 70+ receiving TD.   I'm not impressed.   He doesn't fight for balls and get the ball knocked out of his hands easily.

Smith, IMO, is trying too hard and is making mistakes.  He worked his butt off in TC and I think he'll turn it around.   

Shenault with only 2 receptions looked better than any WR on the team at this moment. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Robbie is our leading receiver based off one 70+ receiving TD.   I'm not impressed.   He doesn't fight for balls and get the ball knocked out of his hands easily.

Smith, IMO, is trying too hard and is making mistakes.  He worked his butt off in TC and I think he'll turn it around.   

Shenault with only 2 receptions looked better than any WR on the team at this moment. 

Robbie so far is alright, better than last year so that's ok. Smith shouldn't have been factored into this offense the way he has been, should've been baby steps. If you want to know how bad the QB play has been, DJ Moore through 3 games has less yardage that Shenault who just got a game jersey. Honestly, the coaches took what should've been a strength of this team and screwed it up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think we drop Anderson from the starting line up and put Shenault, Moore and Smith as our starting 3 WR.  Shenault is a beast and won't go down on first hit.  Robbie is nothing more than a deep threat and since we aren't throwing downfield more. Shenault should get more playing time. 

That's what I meant there. I was typing while working this morning but yes that was my thinking exactly.

Edited by YourLastThought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Oops yep I was. I can't keep up with our yearly bottom end of the WR corps roster. Hoping this guy actually sticks though and makes something of that opportunity

LOL yeah, totally understand that.  Although it looks like ol' Laviska might be a player for us.  I have no such hope for Higgins.  Its been 3 games and he has not even been targeted one time.  SMH.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...