Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Shenault get more playing time?


YourLastThought
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Pakmeng said:

Robbie is the leading receiver and Smith hasn't done anything to warrant being a starter yet. 

Robbie is our leading receiver based off one 70+ receiving TD.   I'm not impressed.   He doesn't fight for balls and get the ball knocked out of his hands easily.

Smith, IMO, is trying too hard and is making mistakes.  He worked his butt off in TC and I think he'll turn it around.   

Shenault with only 2 receptions looked better than any WR on the team at this moment. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Robbie is our leading receiver based off one 70+ receiving TD.   I'm not impressed.   He doesn't fight for balls and get the ball knocked out of his hands easily.

Smith, IMO, is trying too hard and is making mistakes.  He worked his butt off in TC and I think he'll turn it around.   

Shenault with only 2 receptions looked better than any WR on the team at this moment. 

Robbie so far is alright, better than last year so that's ok. Smith shouldn't have been factored into this offense the way he has been, should've been baby steps. If you want to know how bad the QB play has been, DJ Moore through 3 games has less yardage that Shenault who just got a game jersey. Honestly, the coaches took what should've been a strength of this team and screwed it up. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I think we drop Anderson from the starting line up and put Shenault, Moore and Smith as our starting 3 WR.  Shenault is a beast and won't go down on first hit.  Robbie is nothing more than a deep threat and since we aren't throwing downfield more. Shenault should get more playing time. 

That's what I meant there. I was typing while working this morning but yes that was my thinking exactly.

Edited by YourLastThought
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, YourLastThought said:

Oops yep I was. I can't keep up with our yearly bottom end of the WR corps roster. Hoping this guy actually sticks though and makes something of that opportunity

LOL yeah, totally understand that.  Although it looks like ol' Laviska might be a player for us.  I have no such hope for Higgins.  Its been 3 games and he has not even been targeted one time.  SMH.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...