Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Derek Carr anyone?


joemac
 Share

Recommended Posts

We need to stop taking other teams leftover QBs . You can't keep doing it over and over again and expect a different result.  

Keep Sam. Keep Corral. Draft a QB in R2 or R3. Let all 3 of them compete.

 

I'd fill out the defense mostly with the rest of the draft. Maybe a RB for offense.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

We need to stop taking other teams leftover QBs . You can't keep doing it over and over again and expect a different result.  

Keep Sam. Keep Corral. Draft a QB in R2 or R3. Let all 3 of them compete.

 

I'd fill out the defense mostly with the rest of the draft. Maybe a RB for offense.

I keep having wet dreams that the Texas rb falls to us in the 2nd.  That kid is a damn Barkley clone

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, trueblade said:

Said this elsewhere, but if you're not going to take a QB at 9, you've got to do everything to can to trade down and get a 2024 1st rounder to help you move up next year.

Well unless something unusual happens , next yr would be the yr to have the 1st pick.

Edited by heel31ok
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...