Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It sucks Corral will never get his shot this year


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, GoobyPls said:

Corral is taller and was playing with guys who didn’t make the roster 

He played like horrendous trash against basic vanilla defense and he's tiny and has an alligator throwing motion. Not pinning my hopes on that guy at all. We draft a QB or I'm out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The reality is most third round qb picks don't make it.  But Corral will get a shot next year, and with a different and likely better coach.  That will be better for him and slightly increase his chances of doing something for the team.

Highly doubt it. New coaches almost ALWAYS go get their own QB.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TBH, I was extremely surprised Corral looked as bad as he did in preseason.  He looked completely overwhelmed and not like an NFL QB at all - not even a backup.

Unless he improves and makes an incredible leap in his development during a year in which he is sitting out due to injury, which would be extremely unlikely, if not impossible, I honestly don't even see him sticking around the league.  I know he's young and still a rookie, but you usually see something encouraging from guys that gives you something to build on...  he showed absolutely nothing.  I'm all for signing a guy grom another PS or someone who has previous starting experience at this point, but Corral would look even worse than Darnold or Baker has.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Castavar said:

Highly doubt it. New coaches almost ALWAYS go get their own QB.

I am not saying we won't draft a qb.  We probably will unless we sign some big name.  But Corral WILL be here next year and have a shot.  That is almost beyond doubt unless someone wants to trade us something for him.  

Corral may end up being the backup.

Edited by Davidson Deac II
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't forget the young TEs, Coker, Etienne, and Jimmy Horn Jr! 😮 I'm amped to see how the team develops over the course of this upcoming season.
    • She must be doing tricks on that thang for Bill 
    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
×
×
  • Create New...