Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fit and Morgan: SHOULD they stay?


CanadianCat
 Share

Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?  

109 members have voted

  1. 1. Should Fitterer be tired to Rhue?

    • Fire them all
      24
    • Fitterer gets a chance to hire his HC
      85


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I think you have an AGM with some experience that is close to the organization who came from the Buffalo tree.  Throw in the hard worker and obvious knowledge of the game and he is a pretty good candidate.  I think we also have some PTSD from out last AGM that left (Beane).  I'm not saying I'm die hard for Morgan, but I think he could be a good candidate.

What you say makes sense.

I guess I could google some articles about Beanes time here in Charlotte but there were tangible reasons he was well liked.  There were receipts to his work and that was why people were pissed when he left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Beane hired him on as Director of Player Personnel in 2018 in Buffalo for 3 years before we signed him as an Assistant in 2021.  If he learned anything from Beane about building a roster he is worth it, plus there is obvious Panthers familiarity.  

That's not where he got his start.

Look again.

While you're at it, look up who he credits for teaching him how to scout players.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He overpaid for Darnold in spades, and as it stands today you could argue the same for Baker.  Dude is absolutely horrible and is showing why he was so "cheap" and literally no other team wanted him.

Making mistakes at QB makes you look horrible, but it doesn’t make it true that you are.

 

Also you are assuming who made the decisions. We just don’t know for sure.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

We know for a fact he handled the trade compensation for both.  

Sam overpay (everyone thought JeTs SuCk SaM mAyBe OkAy…but our coaching sucks too). 

 

Baker not an overpay.

 

CJ, eye of the beholder.

 

Most importantly though; you hold the premise that our roster is weak. I don’t hold that premise. I know this from prior discussions with you.

Therefore we naturally would have differing opinions on a GM/AGM, QB issues aside. 
 

We both agree our QB’s suck. You see garbage QB’s with a roster you don’t like. I see garbage QB’s with a roster I do like (not implying it’s perfect though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Sam overpay (everyone thought JeTs SuCk SaM mAyBe OkAy…but our coaching sucks too). 

 

Baker not an overpay.

 

CJ, eye of the beholder.

 

Most importantly though; you hold the premise that our roster is weak. I don’t hold that premise. I know this from prior discussions with you.

Therefore we naturally would have differing opinions on a GM/AGM, QB issues aside. 
 

We both agree our QB’s suck. You see garbage QB’s with a roster you don’t like. I see garbage QB’s with a roster I do like (not implying it’s perfect though).

He is literally the worst qb in the nfl, its an absolute overpay especially considering nobody else wanted him and they were going to have to cut him

 

As to the roster I feel its mid to bottom in the nfl.  We need either 1 kick ass draft or 2 average to build some nice depth.

 

What is our strongest position group and then where does that group rank in the nfl?  Then do our 2nd strongest and I think you will see why i think our roster isnt as strong as some of you think

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the GM should go with Rhule.   I think In large part they should always come and go together.  Tepper fugged up keeping Marty.   Right the ship.   
 

Fit’s hand was in Sam, the 5th year option, Robbie extension, Baker and all the real messes.  The real clusterfug started once Fit and Rhule got paired.  He gets a pass on it all from a lot. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

That's not where he got his start.

Look again.

While you're at it, look up who he credits for teaching him how to scout players.

Who Beane?  He credits Hurney for his success....  So we kept Hurney and the Bills took our well liked AGM.  Hopefully we can learn from a little history.

https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/2017/05/15/brandon-beane-credits-former-panthers-gm-marty-hurney-for-success/

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...