Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How could we not give Fitt another chance?!?


DMathematics
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

You weren’t a given a warning for disagreeing or thinking Fitt should get fired.

That's exactly what happened CRA in case you weren't smart enough to figure it out. I've made no other statements here other than Fitt is a bad GM and deserves to be fired. I've made no other arguments for the organization, or politics, religion, culture or anything else either implicit or implied.

Butt @LinvilleGorge doesn't want me showing up the long time 122K poster how wrong he is so he has to step in and threaten me with a perma-ban

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

hey you won dude no worries

mods have determined it's only allowed to say Fitt is a good GM and need to be kept, anything else you get banned

so congrats you won, you can spam this board with another 100K posts of fitt is a great gm and nobody can argue otherwise

knock it off. mods got no dog in that "fitt is a good/bad GM" fight.

it's not ok to keep insulting someone you don't agree with, regardless of how much their posting bothers you

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

knock it off. mods got no dog in that "fitt is a good/bad GM" fight.

it's not ok to keep insulting someone you don't agree with, regardless of how much their posting bothers you

i never claimed that mods had a dog in the fitt good/bad fight, only that they want to step in and stick up for the 122K posters, as been shown here more times than I can remember

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, R0CKnR0LLA said:

i never claimed that mods had a dog in the fitt good/bad fight, only that they want to step in and stick up for the 122K posters, as been shown here more times than I can remember

dude you kept insulting him. you can argue without insulting, you know.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rayzor said:

dude you kept insulting him. you can argue without insulting, you know.

okay fair, but if the way he condescends and disregards any other argument insults people with a a different view should he be banned? i don't see anyone of you mods stepping in to say anything to him for his condescension, do i? that's fair game, but then to post a rebuttal to that you're faced with a perma ban?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

That's exactly what happened CRA in case you weren't smart enough to figure it out. I've made no other statements here other than Fitt is a bad GM and deserves to be fired. I've made no other arguments for the organization, or politics, religion, culture or anything else either implicit or implied.

Butt @LinvilleGorge doesn't want me showing up the long time 122K poster how wrong he is so he has to step in and threaten me with a perma-ban

You got the warning for calling someone an “idiot” as you went about posting your position. 

you seem to have some pretty big blinders on why you got your hand slapped.  No mods give a poo about you bashing Rhule/Tepper/McAdoo/anyone else.  And you don’t bash all those guys as well or as often as many of the mods of this forum have been doing.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CRA said:

  HC and GMs in large part should be married.

Situations from this past offseason: 

Two teams retained their GMs and hired new coaches (Denver, and Miami)

Three teams brought in a new GM, and that GM hired a new coach (Minnesota, Chicago, New York Giants)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, R0CKnR0LLA said:

That's exactly what happened CRA in case you weren't smart enough to figure it out. I've made no other statements here other than Fitt is a bad GM and deserves to be fired. I've made no other arguments for the organization, or politics, religion, culture or anything else either implicit or implied.

Butt @LinvilleGorge doesn't want me showing up the long time 122K poster how wrong he is so he has to step in and threaten me with a perma-ban

Since you want this to play out publicly, fine. But you are definitely playing the victim here when you're far from innocent. And no one threatened you with a permanent ban, simply a vacation if you can't stop with the personal attacks. We usually start with 24 hours. Criticize Scott Fitterer and the team all you want. Just don't use personal attacks toward other posters while you're doing it.

These were the two warnings you were given.

Screenshot_20221012-133240.thumb.png.c2f241119b672fda9042ffb176a8ebb0.png

Screenshot_20221012-133518.thumb.png.9e221af7b37807ac34a3f24123f51cc0.png

Screenshot_20221012-133648.thumb.png.9d580829e792f517a810d8a525aed064.png

 

Screenshot_20221012-133726.thumb.png.e2abc45b357417c9628010121750e888.png

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, trueblade said:

Situations from this past offseason: 

Two teams retained their GMs and hired new coaches (Denver, and Miami)

Three teams brought in a new GM, and that GM hired a new coach (Minnesota, Chicago, New York Giants)

Did the combos in Denver and Miami have prior close connections? Retaining a GM to get a specific coach would be the same difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
    • If there’s any year to be aggressive with it, it’s this one.
×
×
  • Create New...