Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC to the 49ers

Ricky Spanish

By Ricky Spanish,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

If Fitt didn't want the awful QBs we brought here (and Rhule is to blame) then Tepper should have NEVER allowed a structure where the GM is under the HC for personnel moves. What's worse is if Fitt had to basically lie to the public about wanting the crap QBs Rhule forced him to bring here. I don't know if that is some sort of conspiracy theory or what, but the whole structure is rotten if true, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dragoon11 Proficient

Dragoon11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, onmyown said:

I’m for the trade just to be clear but those type of comments come from madden players who watch Panther games and not the actual sport.

no DC is going to scheme and shift around for Forman even if he puts up the same numbers. Other offensive players won’t be getting open, finding gaps and mismatches because foreman is on the field…even if numbers are the same. Forman isn’t making anyone pay dearly for not doubling or spying him. 
 

That’s the difference.

Oh, the typical, "you don't REALLY watch football" comment, can expect at least two of those per subject. If our coaches were half as smart as our huddlers just imagine how kick ass this team would be.

I was being a bit facetious, obviously Foreman is no CMC, but a lot of people said the same thing when Derrick Henry got hurt and Foreman filled in great. Foreman could easily have a 100 yard rushing game, regardless of scheme, he's a very capable RB and has pretty good hands. Albeit, our coaching staff may start Hubbard, lol. Point is... does it REALLY matter? What the hell were we winning WITH CMC? Even if he was 100% of our offense.

I'm 49 years old... why the HELL would I be a "Madden player"? I have too much responsibility kid. And trust me, I've watched the game for a long damn time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, pantherj said:

If Fitt didn't want the awful QBs we brought here (and Rhule is to blame) then Tepper should have NEVER allowed a structure where the GM is under the HC for personnel moves. What's worse is if Fitt had to basically lie to the public about wanting the crap QBs Rhule forced him to bring here. I don't know if that is some sort of conspiracy theory or what, but the whole structure is rotten if true, 

That structure was put in place before Fitterer got here.

It was most likely one of Rhule's conditions for taking the job.

Tepper was stupid to agree to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Catsfan69 Grand Master

Catsfan69

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I wouldn't fire him, especially not over this.

This is a good trade.

You are nuts.

There is nobody we can get that will replace his production.

He is better than the combined value of whoever we get in the 2nd 3rd and 4th.

This a terrible trade and we are screwed for at least 5 years now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ForJimmy
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • tukafan21
      Panthers attempted to trade up with Ravens?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
    • TD alt
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By TD alt · Posted

      He was also apparently.
×
×
  • Create New...