Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offers for Burns

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Krovvy Grand Master

Krovvy

Posted
Posted

The only way I would consider two firsts is if it was the Saints pick the Eagles own, and another first. Otherwise, I think it's going to be a wash with who we would draft with those picks. It would help secure the first overall pick, but I'm not certain we need any more help with that.

So, I don't think it would be worth trading Burns. Realistically, it will be hard to find a replacement via the draft. It could happen in free agency but will cost a huge premium unless the team can turn it around in a year to start luring in free agents that want to be on a competitive team.

However, it's possible the team thinks we still could win too many games this year, and if that's the case they'll definitely try and move Burns. Without him the defensive line will be completely inept, with limited pressure.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

All depends on how we plan on using him next season.

He cannot be great in a 43, only show flashes.  In a 34, he is Von Miller.

In Panther land, under the Defense Dujour, he is good only part of the time.  He sucks when a 320 Tackle is run blocking.  So we need to make up our mind how we are gonna use him before labeling him, trading him or whatever.  Not sure why we are gonna trade guys on D until we have an idea the scheme for next season.

If we put in a 34 and have shipped Burns off, then we are searching again for an elusive player.  If we are gonna run a 43, then get the picks and don't look back

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

this is stupid

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Billy Love said:

A nice contract and the ability to shop for your own players.

“well believe it or not, we actually had some good players. We thought you’d hate that though, so we got rid of them and figured you’d want to just hope for the best.”

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, rayzor said:

Why would you want to do this?

To get you the best coach possible. To get you the most young talent possible. 

Add those to the picks we already got and get a great coach and a clean slate with a lot of picks to build his team with.

Don't stop at Burns, either. Whoever will get you multiple picks, as long as they aren't OL, you trade them  no one outside of the OL is untouchable.

Someone wants Jaycee and is willing to give us a first and more? You trade him.

Someone wants DJ and is willing to part with another first and more or a couple 2nd rounders? You trade him.

Seriously, the more picks you can come away with, the better. 

One way or another, this team is going to be completely unrecognizable next year...and that's a good thing.

You have to stop at some point since you don't want to have too many high picks coming up for contract at once. If we're stacking picks, I hope we go for Harbaugh. HC with experience which seems to be a Tepper requirement. Not too many young offensive minds with a lot of experience available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, hepcat said:

I don't know why you guys stay connected to these players....sure he's a good player, not great. But this team has STUNK with this current collection of guys. I know coaching has been absolutely atrocious and that's a big reason, but a new coaching staff is going to want to bring in their own players anyway. If the Panthers can get a haul for Burns, YOU TAKE IT. There will be a new collection of talented players to cheer for, hopefully a group that wins. 

If you read the rest of my posts in here you would know I’m good with taking a haul. Two firsts minimum. I’m just saying you can’t act like burns is easily replaced. He’s not. We could draft a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Jackie Lee
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By Jackie Lee · Posted

      About as useful as the S2
    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
×
×
  • Create New...