Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Other Games


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

The Bucs have a tough schedule and are playing their worst football. It's unironically gonna be us vs Atlanta for the NFC South.

Next three weeks decide this poo show. But anything can happen in the playoffs 6-1 or not the Giants coming to town would be a winnable game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Doesn't mean we should go all in on the wrong guy. Just look at the Niners with Trey Lance. Good overall roster but hamstrung because they went all in on the wrong guy so now they're having to double down and try to figure out how to win with what amounts to a high end backup in Jimmy G.

 

Bad thing is the FA QBs this off-season aren’t very good. 
So we either draft a QB or hope Corral can be a true starter or resigned Baker or Walker and hope that the team can rise above their problems. 
Either way the QB position from what we have right now in the NFL looks bleak as heck. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Doesn't mean we should go all in on the wrong guy. Just look at the Niners with Trey Lance. Good overall roster but hamstrung because they went all in on the wrong guy so now they're having to double down and try to figure out how to win with what amounts to a high end backup in Jimmy G.

 

Yes. Don't just go all in because QB is our biggest need. Do the scouting work and if you aren't 1000% sure that they are the franchise guy trade down and acquire more assets and draft capital to use later when you identify the right guy. In the meantime, you can sign a vet like Teddy, Cam, or Jimmy G to a 1-year deal and see what's available next offseason. With how bad the South looks right now you'd probably still win the division and wouldn't have any threat to your job security. This is what should of happen in 2020 but Matt Rhule happened. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

Yes. Don't just go all in because QB is our biggest need. Do the scouting work and if you aren't 1000% sure that they are the franchise guy trade down and acquire more assets and draft capital to use later when you identify the right guy. In the meantime, you can sign a vet like Teddy, Cam, or Jimmy G to a 1-year deal and see what's available next offseason. With how bad the South looks right now you'd probably still win the division and wouldn't have any threat to your job security. This is what should of happen in 2020 but Matt Rhule happened. 

Someone out of this draft class (maybe more than one) will probably end up being legit. It's about figuring out who. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Anything can happen except for anyone in this division winning a game.

2 out of 3 teams who made the playoffs with a losing record won their first game, the one loss was Rivera with the Redskins against the eventual SB champions and they actually gave the Bucs quite a fight despite having Taylor Heinicke at QB... Yes odds are the winner of this division gets smoked whoever it is, but it's absolutely possible and believable that they can win a game at home.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Bad thing is the FA QBs this off-season aren’t very good. 
So we either draft a QB or hope Corral can be a true starter or resigned Baker or Walker and hope that the team can rise above their problems. 
Either way the QB position from what we have right now in the NFL looks bleak as heck. 

Pretty much the only FA guys we haven't tried out that I think are interesting are Huntley and Minshew lol...It's Teddy, Sam, Baker, Kyle Allen, Heinicke, Daniel Jones, Brissett. Not that FA QB is usually a good thing but the legit veteran depth is becoming a thing of the past, McCown/Flacco types are washing up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It’s not new. That particular claim has largely disappeared because it has become untenable, but a few games into his rookie year when the playbook/gameplan/personnel/everything was terrible there was endless claims, posts, even threads made that Bryce Young was physically incapable of throwing the ball 20 yards downfield in the NFL. It was also argued that physically throwing the ball 20 yards in the NFL was somehow different than college. Once he threw the ball 20 yards, the goal posts moved to 30 yards, etc. I’m not going to use the search function for you, the point wasn’t as much that one claim as it was that that was one claim out of many that has made it very difficult to have a reasonable discussion here.
    • I mean, I can get a ball downfield 40 yards.  There would be a couple massive issues with me doing it.   My ball placement would be off the charts bad.  Second, for me to get it 40 yards I'm gonna have to moon it......which would give DBs the opportunity to make plays on balls that wouldn't exist if a better QB were throwing it.  Which is all an exaggerated explanation of the Bryce issue.  To many play the literal game w/ Bryce when it comes defending him.  Every NFL QB likely can loft one up around 50 yards.  Every QB in the NFL can't get a ball 30 yards downfield in the same windows.  Or the same ball placement.  That's the Bryce issue.    But I also think mixed into that is just his QB DNA.    Take a young Brees, it was in his DNA to stress defenses and takes shots.  He would flat out be Delhomme-ish at times.  Which is coverage and assignment altering.  Brees would throw balls into triple coverage 40 yards downfield.  Is that smart? Sometimes it is.  Not because the play gets made but you force the secondary to play honest.  
    • Tbf were not going to the superbowl this year so the development of our young wr is invaluable  As a side note 5 of our wr are in their 2nd year or less ( t Mac, Coker, tremayne, horn, x)  It's def a promising youth movement
×
×
  • Create New...