Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rams Offering Two (Future) Firsts for Burns


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, pantherj said:

No no we are still listening.

How many times are you going to post in this thread dude? You are way too hype and you are going to have to flip out when it may not happen. And you keep saying Fitts ruined the team with Darnold when everyone knows he just now has real final roster say. There was an article that laid out how Rhule had final roster say and outlined all of the Darnold deal. I have seen Burns blow up plays and I have seen him washed out by TEs. It is good compensation, but it is also two years down the road. You have to be more even keeled or you are going to be super disappointed. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So Jamal Adams was worth it because the Seahawks were willing to give 2 1sts?

Safety was valued by seahawks front office as a position that changes the game, they were wrong. The 2nd most important position in the NFL is the DE... right behind the QB. There is masssive amounts of data to support this. It's also why they are the second most expensive contracts across the league. Rams would be getting a hell of a deal for BB by offering 2 firsts mutiple drafts away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

I don't overvalue him I already said if we are talking two firsts this year and next I'm listening. We're comparing Burns to CMC now? He definitely hasnt gotten a pass haha people have been complaining about him for months. Is every damn discussion about a player from here on going to go back to CMC? Let it go dude.

The team is losing because no QB and a bad HC... fix those and we arent pointing fingers at players.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

Safety was valued by seahawks front office as a position that changes the game, they were wrong. The 2nd most important position in the NFL is the DE... right behind the QB. There is masssive amounts of data to support this. It's also why they are the second most expensive contracts across the league. Rams would be getting a hell of a deal for BB by offering 2 firsts mutiple drafts away.

Qb is the most important position in the game.  That doesn't make it smart to pay Kirk Cousins like he's elite.  It's not that complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Burns is on his way to have almost the same amount of sacks that Mack had his first 4 years in the NFL before he was traded... they arent that far amount stat wise as players.

I'll check that. Off the top of my head I don't think you're accurate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So Jamal Adams was worth it because the Seahawks were willing to give 2 1sts?

The Seahawks haven't been a very well ran organization for awhile now. Trading two firsts for an in the box safety is a lot different than reading two firsts for a young edge rusher to pair with Aaron Donald.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

So Jamal Adams was worth it because the Seahawks were willing to give 2 1sts?

The Seahawks haven't been a very well ran organization for awhile now. Trading two firsts for an in the box safety is a lot different than reading two firsts for a young edge rusher to pair with Aaron Donald.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

The Seahawks haven't been a very well ran organization for awhile now. Trading two firsts for an in the box safety is a lot different than reading two firsts for a young edge rusher to pair with Aaron Donald.

How much longer is Donald around though?

That discussion has been brought up as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • FLA showed everyone it’s not about superstars. they bullied the best line in the NHL into obscurity. they played hard, were in the right positions, and ran over everything that got in their way.
    • That’s really not what you said and when I even expressed doubt as to your intentions with the post you doubled down and remained unclear on whether you were trying to drag Dean Smith for whatever reason. You just got the facts wrong, which if you don’t follow the local college programs like you say then maybe you just were mistaken and thought Smith didn’t win championships or have legit superstars, and that is ok, but you just doubled down when my first post was more corrective than anything. I’m not sure what you expect posting objectively false things like “RBA has a lot of wins with nothing to show for it like Dean Smith” (paraphrasing) on a message board with plenty of UNC fans. I’m not taking it as a personal affront, we can agree to disagree, Dean Smith’s legacy fortunately will not be affected by this conversation. Screw the (Florida) Panthers?
    • Bring in the free agents and trades.  Florida is the best team and unless Tulsky makes it happen, it’s more of the same…which isn’t bad…but it’s time to win a goddamn cup. 
×
×
  • Create New...