Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official hey the Panthers are wearing black helmets GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Catsfan69 said:

You are retarded. 

PJ on a much better team has a 0.0 game and a whopping 3tds.

Who cares about his guys if he has no physical ability to win in the playoffs 

Wow you mad as fug. Sam Darnold has literally never proven to be more than a numbskull in a QBs body. Meanwhile you poo on Cam every chance you get when his worst day shits all over Sam “I try real Hard then throw an interception” Dawnold. 
 

You are literally Sam Darnolds dad or his impregnated mistress who watches Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson all day. Sam sucks massive dick and will never be a franchise QB. Eat it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Alemanders said:

Hate this opinion all you want

 

Winning when we're not suppose to does so much more for us than laying down and taking it.

These are 53 mofos who signed up to win and will put the effort in win or loss.

 

Youre a bitch team as soon as you want them to lose.

No one cares about your basic bitch fair-weather fan opinion. Just stop.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Alemanders said:

Idk that is just the most pathetic excuse to not play well.

If you genuinely suck to to be compensated to get better that's one thing.

I just don't subscribe to this idea that every individual in the organization needs to purposely lose for the betterment of the franchise.

I'd rather these individuals play their ass off so that when we bring in someone, he walks into a winning org.

I

You don't walk into a winning organization as a new coach unless it's to take over from a retiring coach. That previous guy got fired for a reason. 

If you want to cheer for meaningless wins, feel free. But the reality is we're still going to be a loser and beating bad teams to push us down the draft board is only going to make it tougher for the next coach to build a winner.

I want a winner. That's why I want to lose now.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

You don't walk into a winning organization as a new coach unless it's to take over from a retiring coach. That previous guy got fired for a reason. 

If you want to cheer for meaningless wins, feel free. But the reality is we're still going to be a loser and beating bad teams to push us down the draft board is only going to make it tougher for the next coach to build a winner.

I want a winner. That's why I want to lose now.

I cheer for wins with those that dont consider it meaningless for. The team that went out and won the game today is going to be here next year. And to assume tanking doesnt take a toll on the roster that we currently have is ridiculous. 

Im of the assumption that a coach would benefit more from a winning mindset of a mediocre team, than a downtrodden team.

You also label this as meaningless. Its meaningless to you, as an observer, but do you genuinely thing its meaningless to the players that just played? 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...