Now that Young/Stroud will be gone before the Panthers pick, what FA QB do u want

[Varking]

10 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I don't think he has anyone decent left on his schedule does he? So if they are all scrubs it's going to make him look better.

South Carolina is 6-3

Vandy is 3-6

Florida State is 6-3, ranked in the top 25 and all three of their losses came from ranked opponents. Two of which were by one score. 
 

So no… we aren’t playing some cupcake schedule for the last few weeks to make him look good. On top of that we lost one of our top pass catchers this week due to injury and the flashy guy who caught a nice one handed TD also got hurt. 
 

We already lacked pass catching talent and now we have less. If Richardson performs well it’s because he’s performing well. 

[Catsfan69]

4 minutes ago, Varking said:

South Carolina is 6-3

Vandy is 3-6

Florida State is 6-3, ranked in the top 25 and all three of their losses came from ranked opponents. Two of which were by one score. 
 

So no… we aren’t playing some cupcake schedule for the last few weeks to make him look good. On top of that we lost one of our top pass catchers this week due to injury and the flashy guy who caught a nice one handed TD also got hurt. 
 

We already lacked pass catching talent and now we have less. If Richardson performs well it’s because he’s performing well. 

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

[Catsfan69]

18 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I prefer to look at QBs who have played this past I don't know half a century???  What players did in the 60s doesn't reflect today's NFL.  Different rules, different types of athletes.  We are talking about a Josh Allen style QB and you bring up some guy from the 1960s as the QB you want....

The 60s? He played until 79. He invented the Hail Mary. 

You want a guy that can run well he's the Bible for it.

[ForJimmy]

5 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

The 60s? He played until 79. He invented the Hail Mary. 

You want a guy that can run well he's the Bible for it.

He started in 69, played college in the early 60s. Looks like he finished with 57% completions… Michael Vick was 56.2 and is considered inaccurate by you?

[saX man]

I fully support an all in approach:

R1 if high up: Young or Stroud

R1 if we're not ~pick 5-12: Trade up 

R1 if Young or Stroud can't happen: gamble on the highest remaining ceiling (Richardson or Levis?)

...and you don't stop there

R3-4: Draft another QB 

R5-7: Draft another QB

I dunno, just roll into 2023 with Bryce Young, Grayson McCall, Jake Haener, & Corral.    

Try everything.  Do the RGIII-Cousins strategy and then some.  

Still land some DL and WR peppered between.  

[Mr. Scot]

39 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

@ForJimmy you are pooing the idea of getting Roger Staubach reincarnated?

You like a dual threat QB well using your definition he's the greatest Dual Threat there is. 

But I guess Rings and Gold Jackets are disqualifiers for you.

I like Staubach, but the best dual threat in NFL history is Steve Young.

[SmokinwithWilly]

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I like Staubach, but the best dual threat in NFL history is Steve Young.

It's so close I don't really try to differentiate much. If he can stay healthy, I think Mahomes will eventually be in the conversation, possibly Allen. 

[mav1234]

25 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

Those teams don't suck. They all have NFL talent. Are they among the very best this year? No. But acting like they're a bunch of div3 nothing's when it comes to evaluating a player is pretty crazy.  They will provide useful tape on him for scouts.

[Tr3ach]

1 hour ago, RockyTopVol said:

You can get Hooker in round two. Let him and Corral battle it out in the offseason. 

 

Hooker is like 6 months younger than Darnold.

[Tr3ach]

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

He has a thing against QBs that can run.  He doesn't like change....

The same as lots of people overrate qbs based on their ability to run.  There are plenty from both camps.

Edited November 11, 2022 by Tr3ach
Better worded

[rippadonn]

8 hours ago, Chris Smitty said:

Waiting for Maye. 

 

If we draft in the top 5 pick Will Anderson. If we pick around 10 draft the TE kid from Notre Dame. 

I'd like to see if Will Anderson can play MLB in the NFL. He'd be an absolute monster with his size, jets, quickness, instincts at that position. I see him as a Micah Parsons type possibly not playing at his true NFL position. I think he has the potential to be very special.

He's just a BPA. A smart coach will just take him and put him wherever he needs to be.

[Tbe]

Here’s what’s going to happen.

We will have our third straight 5 win season.

We’ll get the 3rd or 4th best QB in the draft. Neither that QB nor Corral will beat out PJ.

PJ will start again next year. 

Another 5 win season.

[ForJimmy]

43 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

Lol all three of those teams Suck.

South Carolina? The mighty Vandy?

I watched Richardson after you guys talked him up. Specifically went to bars just to watch him. His misses aren't close. His misses are by a mile. 

Who exactly has Drake Maye beat that has you so impressed with him?

[Mr. Scot]

12 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Here’s what’s going to happen.

We will have our third straight 5 win season.

We’ll get the 3rd or 4th best QB in the draft. Neither that QB nor Corral will beat out PJ.

PJ will start again next year. 

Another 5 win season.

With a new coach?

I'm not sure I buy that scenario.