Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is baker the worst QB we have had?


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

Jeff Lewis, Randy Fasani, and Brian St.Peirre all say "Hi!"

Did Lewis ever even start? St. Pierre actually balled the f out considering we grabbed him off the couch out of nowhere.  I remember that long Gettis play not too long ago.  

Clausen is the worst, post-Tommy Jake, and yea, Baker.  He's just really really bad.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's pretty apparent Baker never recovered from his shoulder injury. In his first few years I remember him slinging it so fast the screen refresh rate on my TV couldn't even capture the ball. His passes today look like dying quails. I don't think he's a bad QB, but he doesn't have the tools to be an NFL QB anymore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Ultimate test to determine his long someone's been a fan.

Randy Fasani instantly came to mind...and I'm not sure there's a close second.

Matt Moore is on that list, as is Chris Weinke.

This link tells why many long-term fans have had enough of the bargain-bin, "just manage the game and don't mess it up" QBs. Those names...just lol. Compare that to Green Bay's list for the same time period-- Brett Favre and Aaron Rodgers (with a couple blinks by Jordan Love).

https://wkml.com/listicle/every-carolina-panthers-starting-quarterback-in-team-history/

Matt Moore? He's way up from the bottom 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

No, he's not even close. Mayfield no longer has any mojo or ability to push the ball downfield.

There's something broken in the kid. He needs to sit on the bench and find out who he is going to be. Time to move on to Darnold.

And yes, I know how down the barrel that sounds, but there it is.

 

Could be as simple as he’s playing for the Panthers. I mean the team doesn’t have a track record of good QB play. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...