Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Not nothing is a nice way to put it. I think we’ll have another year like this next season because we won’t solve our QB issue but our division will be bad again.

I would say if we stick with Wilks or some other terrible coach we will stay this way for the foreseeable future. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheWiz said:

I Definitely think this in part. The other shoe is how impatient the league is with developing its QBs , and how poorly they evaluate college QBs. Any game manager could’ve run out offense today. Sam didn’t need to be special. He just needed to not cost us the game 

...AND the reason we can be a playoff team next year with simply a game manager QB if, B-I-G  I-F, we can solidify some other key areas.  Trade back, get more picks and fill some crucial holes on the roster.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Let’s wait till we play another good team. The Broncos are awful and our schedule is downright easy. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes because they’re locked into Wilson and Hackett means a new coach as well. He’s certainly not a good coach struggling. 

The broncos are trash. But we beat them as if we were a good team. 
We are still in striking distance for the NFC south, and I’m watching the Super Bowl champions struggle at 3-7.

Our offense is one dimensional and we’re bearable. Im just saying that Steve Wilks is a good enough coach that we need to go ahead and kiss those top two quarterbacks goodbye. We’ve won with PJ. The tank is over.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We were never getting a top 3 pick, our team has to much talent.

this was predicted by myself and others

this “prepare the roster” philosophy was never practical. It was just a way to lock yourself in eternal mediocrity.

which is what the panthers are

good enough to beat up on dumpster fire franchises like denver

humiliated every time they’ve faced a playoff team

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TLGPanthersFan said:

Also we have to get REALLY lucky on some wins. 

How so?  I get this is a QB driven league, but a solid roster with a game manager QB can be a playoff team.  A solid QB with a dogsh!t roster around him doesn't go very far.  Everyone wants a freaking prima donna QB nowadays.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...