Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft position updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Lol. Not nothing is a nice way to put it. I think we’ll have another year like this next season because we won’t solve our QB issue but our division will be bad again.

I would say if we stick with Wilks or some other terrible coach we will stay this way for the foreseeable future. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheWiz said:

I Definitely think this in part. The other shoe is how impatient the league is with developing its QBs , and how poorly they evaluate college QBs. Any game manager could’ve run out offense today. Sam didn’t need to be special. He just needed to not cost us the game 

...AND the reason we can be a playoff team next year with simply a game manager QB if, B-I-G  I-F, we can solidify some other key areas.  Trade back, get more picks and fill some crucial holes on the roster.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Let’s wait till we play another good team. The Broncos are awful and our schedule is downright easy. I wouldn’t want to be in their shoes because they’re locked into Wilson and Hackett means a new coach as well. He’s certainly not a good coach struggling. 

The broncos are trash. But we beat them as if we were a good team. 
We are still in striking distance for the NFC south, and I’m watching the Super Bowl champions struggle at 3-7.

Our offense is one dimensional and we’re bearable. Im just saying that Steve Wilks is a good enough coach that we need to go ahead and kiss those top two quarterbacks goodbye. We’ve won with PJ. The tank is over.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

We were never getting a top 3 pick, our team has to much talent.

this was predicted by myself and others

this “prepare the roster” philosophy was never practical. It was just a way to lock yourself in eternal mediocrity.

which is what the panthers are

good enough to beat up on dumpster fire franchises like denver

humiliated every time they’ve faced a playoff team

Edited by Growl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TLGPanthersFan said:

Also we have to get REALLY lucky on some wins. 

How so?  I get this is a QB driven league, but a solid roster with a game manager QB can be a playoff team.  A solid QB with a dogsh!t roster around him doesn't go very far.  Everyone wants a freaking prima donna QB nowadays.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...