Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns on Wilks

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

I also wouldn't be mad at Lane Kiffin. Especially if he had a better second stint as HC in the NFCS. If he became a good/great coach and the Panthers gave him the chance Tampa didn't and we unknowingly create a chicken coming home to roost situation for a division rival?! All the more delicious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

This coaching hire should be top priority and guys who may want the job who have a .690 NFL win percentage may want to talk to the Panthers about the HC job. He was a Panther himself and a longtime Bears QB also. Before hiring Matt Rhule Vegas had Harbaugh as odds favorite. There's a reason for that. It was our best move.....and we brought in the clown.

Talk to Harbaugh.

Excited Michigan Football GIF by Michigan Athletics

I wouldn't hate it, but you gotta think there's a near 0% chance the next hire comes from college after this mess with Rhule.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
51 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I wouldn't hate it, but you gotta think there's a near 0% chance the next hire comes from college after this mess with Rhule.

He's a lifelong NFL guy as a player/Coach who happens to be coaching in college again.

This is the man who developed Andrew Luck and the man who took one read Kraepernick to a Superbowl and almost beat his brother John.

Four years coaching up the crappy disfunctional 49ers to the big game amassing a .695 win percentage in 4yrs in a tough NFL?!

There's nobody more NFL ready in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

Burns was polished in the interview 

However, on not endorsing the ‘team is better under’  Wilks comment, another point of view is  perhaps Burns didn’t like being called out as ‘stars need to be stars’ from Wilks 

I don’t disagree at all with Wilks on that comment   It needed to be said if they are ever going to start beating better competition 

burns has a tendency to disappear against better teams at times.  Some of that is double teams and not having another rusher to help out 

lets see how a rested Burns does against Seattle …which has a QB that can throw from the pocket and a decent RB 

I hope he tears Seattle up 

or, he could’ve felt it insulting as he felt the defense had played well all year, who knows 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • Basbear
      Processing Blue: immediate draft needs

      By Basbear · Posted

      He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
    • uncfan888
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By uncfan888 · Posted

      Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...