Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Teams are doing homework on Jim Harbaugh


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let’s see, the stands are fairly empty. Tepper is a business man. I think he will hire a coach that puts asses in seats. Maybe that’s Harbaugh or maybe someone else, I can’t image who else though (Payton will not come here).

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just think his personality is better suited for the college game where it's younger kids who cycle in and out of the program in 3-5 years and that in the NFL his coaching style wears thin on grown ass men over the long haul.

lmao that's not what happened tho

it was Baalke's and York's ego that ousted Jim, not his "abrasiveness".

Politics, not coaching lost the gig.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rags said:

lmao that's not what happened tho

it was Baalke's and York's ego that ousted Jim, not his "abrasiveness".

Politics, not coaching lost the gig.

Yep and it was “leaked” the players were tired of him. Tired of winning? Hell if any players were upset it was the ones wanting to collect a paycheck without putting in the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How familiar are y'all with Harbaugh and his antics? You seriously don't understand why that would wear thin in a locker room of grown men?

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

13-3 his first season

44-19 career

 

He took over a 6-10 team.    

 

He would immediately elevate this franchise.  Wtf are you babbling about?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

He would probably be communicating more with Fitts. Who I actually think would work well with him. Fitts seems pretty laid back and that’s what you need with Jim Harbaugh.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...