Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Teams are doing homework on Jim Harbaugh


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let’s see, the stands are fairly empty. Tepper is a business man. I think he will hire a coach that puts asses in seats. Maybe that’s Harbaugh or maybe someone else, I can’t image who else though (Payton will not come here).

Edited by philit99
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I just think his personality is better suited for the college game where it's younger kids who cycle in and out of the program in 3-5 years and that in the NFL his coaching style wears thin on grown ass men over the long haul.

lmao that's not what happened tho

it was Baalke's and York's ego that ousted Jim, not his "abrasiveness".

Politics, not coaching lost the gig.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Rags said:

lmao that's not what happened tho

it was Baalke's and York's ego that ousted Jim, not his "abrasiveness".

Politics, not coaching lost the gig.

Yep and it was “leaked” the players were tired of him. Tired of winning? Hell if any players were upset it was the ones wanting to collect a paycheck without putting in the work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

How familiar are y'all with Harbaugh and his antics? You seriously don't understand why that would wear thin in a locker room of grown men?

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

13-3 his first season

44-19 career

 

He took over a 6-10 team.    

 

He would immediately elevate this franchise.  Wtf are you babbling about?

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Apparently not.

I'm also kind of chuckling that the people who think all his problems stemmed from poor / clueless ownership think he'll be an automatic success when paired with David Tepper.

He would probably be communicating more with Fitts. Who I actually think would work well with him. Fitts seems pretty laid back and that’s what you need with Jim Harbaugh.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...