Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Baker Mayfield: Top Landing Spots


KatsAzz
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, Basbear said:

It would hurt the 49ers chances for a deep run, thats the main reason. They dont need or want him, seahawks could do the same......49ers may have the best D when healthy, clear path to deep run even with a sucky-ass QB....

 

plus in thoery you could claim him and hope to the heavens some dumb team signs him to crazy deal thus giving you a shot at a late comp pick.... If baker is on your QB radar, what better/cheaper way than 1.4million(nfl pennies) for a 5 game tryout?? Much cheaper than signing him to some 12 million one year deal. 

Well, you were right and I was wrong.  Seems a waste of money to me, but I suppose the Rams have a plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not that it would have mattered...

I wish Baker Mayfield all the luck in the world and hope he can fit in on  his new team.

Perhaps Baker can  become a decent back up QB because it looks like his NFL starting days could be a thing of the past.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Not a bad move for LA--they have 4 games or so to see if he fits their system.  Kinda like a preseason.

We just need him to get hot for like 2 games minimum.

Baker....you didn't help us here but you can help us there. Win some fuging games, buddy.

Give us that draft pick back by bumping the Rams down that order.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Well, you were right and I was wrong.  Seems a waste of money to me, but I suppose the Rams have a plan.

Brother, this isnt a right or wrong deal for me. I know how much the Rams hate 49ers, similar to panthers hate for saints... Pure guess form my standpoint.  I bet rams were not the only team as well, maybe a couple more. It was a waste, just a tiny NFL one and it hurts thy enemy..

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I still contend no well run team would have him on the roster next year.  You got to move on from him.  And you can't put the #1 overall pick, 3 year starter as the backup...that creates horrific in house dynamics. 
    • I do think there is a win/lose aspect he is presently in with his QB situation.   Let's say he does some really good Steve Wilks play ugly to win coaching......with a really ugly game plan beats SF (which we could have), gets New Orleans, and a Tampa game.  Completely minimizes Bryce Young.  well, that would have put him at 9-8 on the season.   And then......Bryce Young is going nowhere.  Maybe Morgan replaces Dalton but the Bryce conundrum gets even worse.  Now you go that 5th year.  and we know Bryce is going to get unfair credit.  He already gets absurd credit for anything that goes okay.  you are to an extent damned if you do if you are Canales IMO.   I want them all gone.  I just don't think Tepper can get the hire.  I think the only way Tepper can get a good hire....is to give a decent coach way more power than Tepper would like.  
    • As a general optimist who tries to be even handed, I was in the “I have hope” but it’s now gone category.  I acknowledged that the bad games were more frequent than the OK ones which were in turn more frequent than the good ones. I just held out hope that he could put things together and more consistently perform at those mid and higher levels. But I’m off that train now. I think he can probably improve his consistency a bit from where he is, but it’ll never be good enough. He’s on the roster next year because he’s under contract, but I don’t think we should pick up his 5th year option and definitely not extend him. He may start next year too because there genuinely are not as many competent QBs as there are starting spots in the league, so the alternatives are all trash. But we’ve got to get fresh blood in the QB room and find our next starter. 
×
×
  • Create New...