Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Person looks at Mayfield, Rhule and "revisionist history"


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

It will be fun to see how much more behind the curtain we get to see as a result of Rhule frantically trying to change the narratives about his tenure here. So much would have just stayed behind the scenes and now it is going to be public because he crossed so many people.

I don't know whether Person already knew all this stuff (sounds like he might have) or if any of it was "mysteriously leaked" to him.

And yeah, more of that wouldn't surprise me.

  • Beer 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, stbugs said:

That’s why I take everything after someone leaves with a grain of salt. Heck, it happens in every business. The person who left gets thrown under the bus to make the current folks look good. We saw all the wow the Panthers are all of a sudden tough now, which lasted a couple days before Cincy took us to the woodshed.

Not saying Rhule didn’t suck, just that the current staff has the local reporters ears and those reporters will likely say whatever they are told and no chance it will it be bad news about the current staff.

I just ignore these snippets because I’ve seen it even in my line of work where the people that left get blamed for things they did and things some people want other people to believe they did. Some truth, some under the bus throwing and we’ll likely never really know because we weren’t there.

Difference here is they weren't saying anything at all, and still might not be. Person may have already known all this.

Rhule could have kept quiet too, but he chose to shoot his mouth off.

So if there are any further revelations, it'll be his own fault.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stbugs said:

May have, that’s my point. I know you despise Rhule but he’s gone, time to stop dwelling. I’m sure you’ve worked at jobs where people left, especially not on great terms. Stories and throwing people under the bus was common, especially by folks who wanted to look better and the folks who wanted to look better can disseminate their story. The people who left don’t have the same mouth pieces (local reporters here). There are truths because there’s reasons why they left and there are blame games to get the bad moves on someone else’s resume.

If Person knew before, why not make it a story early on when Mayfield is floundering. I remember more than a few people in here giving kudos to Fitterer for Mayfield and making more decisions this year, including you. Now that Mayfield is a bust, he’s hooked to Rhule who’s already gone and to be honest, unless we have a recording of it, we’ll never know the truth, which is probably something lame like a joint decision.

Now you're revising history.

So apparently the real reason for your skepticism is it contradicts your narrative.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Phil Snow's...

correct.

https://www.nfl.com/news/matt-rhule-on-why-panthers-didn-t-pick-qb-in-draft-i-just-believe-in-sam-darnold

 

"We were sitting there one day on defense, and I can't remember (exactly) what we were watching, we were watching a cut up, and Sam was playing on the other side of the ball, and a couple times he made some throws, and Phil Snow, our defensive coordinator, was like, 'Man, that kid looks like Matt Stafford.' And so, we put a couple games on – and this is the defensive staff -- and they were all like, 'You know what, every game we watch, he makes a couple of big-time plays, and there has to be some meat on the bone there,' "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...