Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jeremy Chinn...


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I don't get why we don't blitz him off the edge more...the man is a heat-seeking missile.  His coverage on the other hand scares me.  Was hoping his *mis*usage (imo) was more of a Rhule/Snow thing but nothing seems to have changed with Chinn's role in the Wilks era.

We did in the 2nd half. We brought in Burris and dropped Hartsfield back. I counted about 8 snaps that Chinn was LB on the field. At one point we had Luvu, Smith, Chinn, and Shaq as our LBs. Luvu got a sack on that play. 

The 2nd half we made adjustments and the Seahawks didnt score a TD until the final 14 seconds of the game.

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

First half they were high-low'ing him pretty effectively. Not sure how they were scheming to get him into those situations. 

Also I get that Lockett is a very good, shifty receiver but Chinn looked hesitant out there. 

Still made a big play in the fourth quarter, but they need to get back to what they were doing his rookie year. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

We did in the 2nd half. We brought in Burris and dropped Hartsfield back. I counted about 8 snaps that Chinn was LB on the field. At one point we had Luvu, Smith, Chinn, and Shaq as our LBs. Luvu got a sack on that play. 

The 2nd half we made adjustments and the Seahawks didnt score a TD until the final 14 seconds of the game.

This makes me feel better about keeping Wilks if that is what happens.  Rivera's lack of adjustments always drove me crazy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Let’s be real, there’s no way the Bengals can trade him for less than first round value from an optics stand point.
    • Disclaimer:  In June, I am usually optimistic.  In October, a policeman with a bullhorn is telling me that I have a lot of life ahead of me and to think about my loved ones as I gaze down upon him from my rooftop.   Having said that, I think our offense (down the stretch) was good enough to play KC and Philly tough.  So how many games would this offense have won if they played the entire season like they did in November-January and if they had a better defense?   If you could stretch the last nine games over an entire season and put a solid defense on the other side, I see 5 wins becoming 7 or 8.  Down the stretch, the Panther D surrendered 30 points or more in 5 of the final 7 games and managed to win 2 of those 5.  If they can win 40% of games in which their defense surrenders 30 points or more, then the math indicates, had that been the case all season, the Panthers should have won 6 or 7 games with their defense surrendering 30+ points.   This season, we are much better at WR (TMac, Renfrow, Horn, and I expect XL to be a lot better).  Bryce is confident and now a leader.    The Achilles' heel of the 2024 defense, the DL, seems to be very solid.  We got back Horn and Jackson on the corners, Smith-Wade is improving better than expected, we signed a stud Safety.  Derrick Brown returns.  While the D is not there yet, it is going to be better.   So if we ended the second half of 2024 playing at a level that should have produced 6-7 wins, better WRs and a better defense could result in 9 wins or more.       
×
×
  • Create New...