Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Let’s go Cardinals


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

42 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

If Arizona wins tomorrow I think we could win the south next week with a win and New Orleans loss. 

according to this playoff machine thing it wouldnt be locked unless Atlanta also lost to arizona next week.  Oddly, In the playoff machine thing, if tampa loses out, Atlanta wins the last 2, (last week against tampa), and we lose to the saints who lose next week, but beat us in the last week, the saints somehow win the division, but if tampa beat atlanta in the last game of the season even if we lose, we're in.  This division is all sorts of fugy.

Edited by Carolina Cajun
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

according to this playoff machine thing it wouldnt be locked unless Atlanta also lost to arizona next week.  Oddly, In the playoff machine thing, if tampa loses out, Atlanta wins the last 2, (last week against tampa), and we lose to the saints who lose next week, but beat us in the last week, the saints somehow win the division, but if tampa beat atlanta in the last game of the season even if we lose, we're in.  This division is all sorts of fugy.

If we win next we we’d both have 7 wins even if Atlanta won out. I think we’d have tiebreaker over them based on division record. I could be wrong. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Carolina Cajun said:

according to this playoff machine thing it wouldnt be locked unless Atlanta also lost to arizona next week.  Oddly, In the playoff machine thing, if tampa loses out, Atlanta wins the last 2, (last week against tampa), and we lose to the saints who lose next week, but beat us in the last week, the saints somehow win the division, but if tampa beat atlanta in the last game of the season even if we lose, we're in.  This division is all sorts of fugy.

Confused David Icke GIF by Squirrel Monkey

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Carolina Cajun said:

according to this playoff machine thing it wouldnt be locked unless Atlanta also lost to arizona next week.  Oddly, In the playoff machine thing, if tampa loses out, Atlanta wins the last 2, (last week against tampa), and we lose to the saints who lose next week, but beat us in the last week, the saints somehow win the division, but if tampa beat atlanta in the last game of the season even if we lose, we're in.  This division is all sorts of fugy.

I didn't believe it at first but that's actually right. In that scenario, Carolina, New Orleans and Atlanta would be tied at 7-10. The first tie breaker for the division is record between the tied teams. In the scenario you outlined, those would be:

Carolina: 2-2

Atlanta: 1-3

New Orleans: 3-1

That would be a really sucky way to lose the division but amazingly in play. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Peon Awesome said:

I didn't believe it at first but that's actually right. In that scenario, Carolina, New Orleans and Atlanta would be tied at 7-10. The first tie breaker for the division is record between the tied teams. In the scenario you outlined, those would be:

Carolina: 2-2

Atlanta: 1-3

New Orleans: 3-1

That would be a really sucky way to lose the division but amazingly in play. 

We have two scenarios. We win out or Tampa loses out(plus the saints loose to Philly). Anything else and we don’t make the playoffs. We can lose to the saints, if we beat Tampa next week and still make it in. Caveat: All our hopes would be resting on Atlanta at that point. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not exactly sure that is an honest assesment of the talent he had to work with that year. Olsen had over 1100 yards that season making the PB, Stewart had close to 1100 total yards also going to the PB. He had Kalil at C who went to the PB, Trai Turner at RG who also went to the PB, and Michael Oher at LT who played well enough that the Panthers offered him a new contract the following year. I wouldn't call that a trash OL. He also played with a defense that was stacked with talent as well.   "The thing we are doing better this time around is actually surrounding our #1 overall draft pick QB with talent vs. asking him to completely carry the offense. I just hope that effort is leading us to realize that the guy isn't even good enough to get carried." Please.... Did you not read the list of names Newton had to work with his rookie season. I guess you missed it so I will post it again for you... Steve Smith (PB), Greg Olsen (PB), Brandon LaFell, Ted Ginn JR, Deangelo Williams (PB), Jonathan Stewart (PB), Jordan Grossn (PB), Ryan Kalil (PB) on the offensive side and then he had Luke Kuechly (PB), Jon Beason (PB), Thomas Davis (PB), Star Lotulelei, Kawann Short ( PB ),Charles Johnson, Greg Hardy (PB ), Mike Mitchell, Josh Norman (PB)  For comparison, here is who Young had his first year.  Chuba Hubbard, DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Adam Thielen, Hayden Hurst, Ikem Ekwonu, Chandler Zavala, Bradley Bozeman, Nash Jensen and Taylor Morton. Not a single PB player on the list and most of them aren't even playing any longer. Additionally, his HC was fired during the season and the defense was as bad as the offense.  You might not like the comparison but saying Newton had to completely carry the offense isn't exactly fair to the 4 pro bowlers on offense who played with him that year.
    • That's why I say we have to keep looking. Even if you believe Bryce is the guy, KP and Grier are not and who knows if King is anything more than a gimmick player, we should be active in improving our 2nd QB spot. Season ending injuries happen, and you don't just want to roll over and give it up. How many starters have we seen come from the ranks of backup? Having 2 potential starting QBs is one of the best problems we could have. 
    • Eh, it’s more on how bad the refs are. Some of these calls against the canes are no calls 
×
×
  • Create New...